Skip to main content

Is 100scopenotes.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 100scopenotes.com Reviews

100scopenotes.com favicon

Is 100scopenotes.com Safe? Security Analysis for 100 Scope Notes – A School Library Journal Blog

Check if 100scopenotes.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaN/asmall
JavaScriptCSSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AdsAddToAny sharing
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 10:48:23 AM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

100 Scope Notes is a specialized blog under the School Library Journal network, focusing on children's literature, book reviews, and related educational content. The website targets librarians, educators, parents, and enthusiasts of children's books. It operates on a content publishing model supported by advertising, primarily Google Ads, and maintains a consistent brand presence with regular content updates and social media engagement. The domain is well-established since 2010, indicating a mature online presence.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AdsAddToAny sharing

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The blog holds a niche position within the children's literature media sector, leveraging its affiliation with the School Library Journal to attract a dedicated audience. Its business model relies on advertising revenue and content engagement. The site integrates with multiple social media platforms to extend reach and engagement. While it lacks explicit business contact details and formal privacy or cookie policies, its content quality and network affiliation provide credibility. The absence of detailed business information and compliance documentation suggests room for growth in professionalization and regulatory adherence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, and uses Google Tag Manager and Google Ads scripts for analytics and monetization. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which are recommended for enhanced protection. DNSSEC is not enabled, representing a minor security gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could benefit from implementing additional best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and prominently display a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve privacy compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A School Library Journal Blog focused on children's literature, book reviews, and related articles.

Key Services:
Book reviewsArticles on children's literatureBlog postsNewsletter
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AdsAddToAny sharing
Frameworks:
WordPress Genesis Framework
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Right click protection on images
  • Use of Google Tag Manager

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsDoubleClick
Marketing Tools:
AddToAny sharing
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a content-rich blog focused on children's literature and library topics.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 32 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

44 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(124 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10
Name Servers:
ns1.justhost.comDNS only
ns1.pipedns.comWHOIS only
ns2.justhost.comDNS only
ns2.pipedns.comWHOIS only
ns3.pipedns.comWHOIS only
MX Records:
0: 100scopenotes.com
SOA:Serial: 2025040400, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:72ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress using the Genesis Framework, leveraging modern web technologies including JavaScript, CSS, and integration with Google services for analytics and advertising. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good navigation clarity. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed and accessibility. The technical stack is standard for content publishing sites, with no critical technical debt or vulnerabilities detected from the provided data. Opportunities exist to enhance SEO and accessibility features further.
Analyze Another Website