Skip to main content

Is 163.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 网易 Reviews

163.com favicon

Is 163.com Safe? Security Analysis for 网易

Check if 163.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinaenterprise
JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseOrigin Trial APIsLazy loading imagesResponsive design
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:53:13 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

NetEase (网易) is a leading Chinese internet technology company providing a broad range of services including free email, gaming, search engine, news, entertainment, sports, education, and interactive platforms such as blogs and forums. The website www.163.com serves as a comprehensive portal aggregating over 30 content channels and multiple digital services targeting a general audience in China. The company holds a strong market position as a major internet media and technology provider in China with enterprise scale and extensive product offerings.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseOrigin Trial APIsLazy loading imagesResponsive design

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

NetEase operates a diversified business model centered on internet technology and media services. Revenue streams likely include advertising, premium email services, gaming, e-commerce, and educational content. The website integrates multiple partner and subsidiary domains reflecting a broad ecosystem. The target customer segments are general internet users in China seeking news, entertainment, education, and communication services. The company demonstrates strong branding consistency and trust signals such as search engine verifications and recognized product brands.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

j*****@vip.163.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and includes multiple search engine verification meta tags, indicating good baseline security practices. However, explicit security headers are not detected in the provided data, and no published privacy or cookie policies were found, which are gaps in compliance and security transparency. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found. The absence of WHOIS data is a concern but likely due to privacy or registry policies rather than malicious intent. Overall, the security posture is good but could be improved with enhanced headers, published policies, and incident response contacts.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies accessible from the homepage.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

网易

Description:

网易是中国领先的互联网技术公司,为用户提供免费邮箱、游戏、搜索引擎服务,开设新闻、娱乐、体育等30多个内容频道,及博客、视频、论坛等互动交流,网聚人的力量。

Key Services:
Free emailGamesSearch engineNews channelsEntertainmentSportsBlogsVideoForums
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle AdsenseOrigin Trial APIsLazy loading imagesResponsive design
Platforms:
WebMobile (redirect to m.163.com)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced (redirect to https://m.163.com for mobile)
  • Google site verification
  • Baidu and other search engine verifications

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google AdsenseNex.163.com
Tracking Pixels:
Google Adsense
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a major Chinese internet portal operated by NetEase.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.163.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

21 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:59.111.160.244
Name Servers:
ns1.nease.netDNS only
ns2.166.comDNS only
ns3.nease.netDNS only
ns4.nease.netDNS only
ns5.nease.netDNS only
ns6.nease.netDNS only
ns8.166.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: 163mx02.mxmail.netease.com
50: 163mx00.mxmail.netease.com
10: 163mx03.mxmail.netease.com
10: 163mx01.mxmail.netease.com
SOA:Serial: 20278888, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:409ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.163.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses modern web technologies including asynchronous JavaScript, lazy loading images, and responsive design optimized for mobile devices with automatic redirection. Advertising is integrated primarily via Google Adsense and internal ad networks. The site demonstrates good SEO optimization with meta tags and search engine verifications. Accessibility features such as ARIA roles and keyboard navigation aids are present. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected from the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website