Skip to main content

Is 1kx.network a Scam? Security Check Results - 1kx Reviews

1kx.network favicon

Is 1kx.network Safe? Security Analysis for 1kx

Check if 1kx.network is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
ReactNext.jsFathom AnalyticsGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:07:33 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

1kx is a specialized early-stage crypto investment firm focused on ecosystem growth and network building within the decentralized technology space. Their business model centers on supporting founders in bootstrapping token networks and providing advisory services on token economics and community governance. The firm positions itself as a key player in the web3 investment landscape, emphasizing hands-on involvement and research-driven insights. Technically, the website is built on modern frameworks such as Next.js and React, with integration of analytics tools like Fathom and Google Analytics, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is performant, mobile-optimized, and SEO-friendly, indicating good digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities, though the absence of explicit security headers and privacy policies suggests room for improvement. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common in crypto domains, and no suspicious patterns were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-positioned in its niche, but could enhance transparency and compliance by adding privacy and cookie policies and clearer contact information.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsFathom AnalyticsGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

1kx operates in the competitive crypto investment sector with a niche focus on ecosystem and network growth. Their competitive advantage lies in their deep involvement in token model design and community governance, which differentiates them from generic investment firms. Revenue streams likely include equity or token stakes in early-stage projects. The target customers are crypto founders and web3 innovators seeking strategic and financial support. The firm maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including career portals and research publications, enhancing its market presence. Strategic observations include the need to improve privacy compliance and incident response transparency to align with evolving regulatory expectations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a published security policy or incident response contacts indicate gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, which could hinder responsible vulnerability reporting. Compliance with GDPR and cookie consent mechanisms is not evident, posing potential regulatory risks. The security culture appears nascent but professional, with recommendations to formalize policies and improve transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

1kx

Description:

1kx is an early-stage investment firm focused on ecosystem growth. They specialize in crypto investment and network building to support decentralized futures. The firm helps founders bootstrap token networks and provides hands-on advisory for token model design and iteration.

Key Services:
investment in crypto projectsecosystem growth advisorytoken model design and iterationcommunity building
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsFathom AnalyticsGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of modern frameworks

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Fathom AnalyticsGoogle Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Fathom Analytics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@1kx.capital

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 28 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:76.76.21.21
Name Servers:
ns35.domaincontrol.comDNS only
ns36.domaincontrol.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2024061900, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:83ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js and React, leveraging server-side rendering and static generation for performance. It uses DatoCMS for content management and integrates Fathom and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is well-optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with appropriate meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is fast with minimal blocking scripts. However, the absence of explicit security headers and privacy mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider details are not explicit but likely cloud-based. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and robust but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website