Skip to main content

Is 1stgarage.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Acme Inc. Reviews

1stgarage.lv favicon

Is 1stgarage.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Acme Inc.

Check if 1stgarage.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook Pixel+1 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:23:24 PM
49
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

1 St Garage is a self-service automotive repair garage located in Riga, Latvia, offering customers the ability to rent workspace equipped with car lifts, tools, and diagnostic equipment to perform their own vehicle maintenance and repairs. The business targets vehicle owners who prefer a DIY approach, providing consultation from qualified mechanics and access to auto parts. The website is built on the Tilda CMS platform and integrates modern analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The technical infrastructure is adequate for a small local business, with good mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is decent with HTTPS enabled, but lacks security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, indicating compliance gaps. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy image consistent with a small transportation sector business.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelTilda CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in a niche market segment within the transportation industry, focusing on self-service auto repair. Its business model revolves around renting garage space and providing tools and expertise to customers, which may generate revenue through hourly or daily rental fees and parts sales. The presence of social media links and Google site verification suggests active digital marketing efforts. The business appears small-sized with localized operations in Riga. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The website content and branding are moderately consistent, with trust signals such as embedded maps and verified contact information. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may pose risks for GDPR compliance and customer trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@gmail.com

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712836****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web vulnerabilities. The use of third-party analytics and marketing scripts introduces potential privacy concerns, especially without clear cookie consent mechanisms or privacy disclosures. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Incident response contact information is absent, limiting the ability to report security issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by implementing best practices and compliance measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Acme Inc.

Description:

Self-service auto repair garage in Riga offering workspace with car lifts, tools, diagnostics, and consultation for customers to repair their own vehicles.

Key Services:
Workspace rental with car liftsAccess to tools and diagnostic equipmentConsultations and advice from qualified mechanicsAccess to auto parts with deliverySecured parking
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsFacebook PixelTilda CMS
Frameworks:
Tilda Blocks
Platforms:
Tilda
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel for analytics

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag ManagerFacebook Pixel
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:5.181.161.80
Name Servers:
ns1.tildadns.comDNS only
ns2.tildadns.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2024010902, TTL: 7200s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:159ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Tilda CMS platform, leveraging Tilda Blocks for layout and design. It uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS, and JavaScript with jQuery. Analytics and marketing are handled via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Facebook Pixel. The site is hosted on Tilda's CDN, ensuring reasonable performance and availability. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal with only basic meta tags present. The site lacks advanced technical configurations such as security headers and structured data (JSON-LD). Overall, the technical implementation is suitable for a small business but has room for modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website