Skip to main content

Is 2016ruanwen.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 媒介星网络科技有限公司 Reviews

2016ruanwen.com favicon

Is 2016ruanwen.com Safe? Security Analysis for 媒介星网络科技有限公司

Check if 2016ruanwen.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaChinamedium
jQueryCSSHTML5
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 4:35:02 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

媒介星网络科技有限公司运营的2016ruanwen.com是一个专业的软文推广及新闻稿发布平台,成立于2016年,面向企业客户和营销人员,提供软文推广、新闻源营销、软文代写及定制企业推广方案等服务。该平台拥有丰富的媒体资源和企业合作,市场认可度较高,致力于为客户提供高效率、低成本的互联网品牌推广服务。网站内容丰富,设计专业,导航清晰,用户体验良好,适合目标客户群体使用。技术上,网站采用基础的jQuery和CSS技术,托管于阿里云,性能表现中等,移动优化和无障碍支持基本。安全方面,网站启用了HTTPS并使用验证码保护登录,但缺少DNSSEC和安全HTTP头,且无隐私及Cookie政策,存在一定合规风险。整体安全评分中等,建议加强安全策略和合规措施。网站无成人或不当内容,适合一般公众访问。

Detected Technologies

jQueryCSSHTML5

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

媒介星网络科技有限公司定位为国内专业的软文投放平台,拥有约8000家媒体资源和5000家企业合作,涵盖上市集团、政府机构及公关公司。其业务模式基于自助新闻发布平台和代理销售,提供多样化套餐和定制服务,满足不同企业的品牌推广需求。公司通过客户评价和成功案例展示其市场信誉和服务质量。合作伙伴众多,形成较为完善的生态系统。公司注册信息与网站内容一致,域名注册时间与业务成立时间匹配,显示出稳定的市场存在。未来增长潜力依赖于提升安全合规性和扩大市场影响力。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (1)

189*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站安全成熟度处于中等水平。启用了HTTPS保障数据传输安全,登录表单集成了验证码防止自动攻击,但缺少关键安全HTTP头(如CSP、HSTS等),未启用DNSSEC,存在潜在DNS劫持风险。未发现隐私政策和Cookie政策,存在合规缺口,尤其在GDPR等法规环境下风险较大。无公开的安全事件响应或漏洞披露渠道,安全文化和事件管理能力未知。建议加强安全头配置,启用DNSSEC,完善隐私合规文档,并建立安全事件响应机制以提升整体安全防护水平。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

启用DNSSEC以增强域名系统安全,防止DNS劫持。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

媒介星网络科技有限公司

Description:

媒介星软文推广平台是目前广告市场上最专业的软文发布平台,汇集全国几千家媒体,专业软文发布、新闻发布、软文推广、微商推广、门户网站发布、提供高效的服务,客户自助注册就能发稿。为广大客户提供高效率,低成本的软文推广发布服务。

Key Services:
软文推广新闻源营销企业定制推广方案软文代写自助新闻发布平台
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryCSSHTML5
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Captcha on login form

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and no blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 41 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

82 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:113.1.0.217, 116.163.31.218, 116.153.3.74, 116.162.168.167, 60.211.209.111, 1.56.98.184, 218.29.205.118, 218.29.50.234, 116.131.57.65
Name Servers:
dns10.hichina.comDNS only
dns9.hichina.comDNS only
MX Records:
5: mxn.mxhichina.com
10: mxw.mxhichina.com
SOA:Serial: 2025032613, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:827ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于传统的HTML5和CSS技术,使用jQuery库实现交互效果,技术栈较为基础但稳定。托管于阿里云,域名注册时间较长,显示出一定的技术稳定性。网站性能表现中等,移动端优化和无障碍支持基本,SEO基础元素存在但未见高级优化。缺少现代前端框架和内容管理系统,存在技术升级空间。安全配置不足,缺少关键安全头和DNSSEC,存在潜在风险。整体技术架构适合当前业务规模,但建议逐步引入现代技术和安全最佳实践以支持未来扩展。
Analyze Another Website