Skip to main content

Is 253874.net a Scam? Security Check Results - 253874.net Reviews

253874.net favicon

Is 253874.net Safe? Security Analysis for 里屋-青少年技术论坛

Check if 253874.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationN/asmall
HTML5CSS GridJavaScript
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 12:12:04 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.253874.net presents itself as a Chinese youth technology forum titled '里屋-青少年技术论坛'. It offers discussion forums and chatroom features targeting young technology enthusiasts. However, the domain WHOIS data is missing, indicating the domain is likely unregistered or expired, which raises significant concerns about the legitimacy and ownership of the site. The website's business model appears to be an online community platform, but no verifiable business or contact information is provided. Technically, the site uses modern HTML5, CSS Grid, and JavaScript for layout and interactive resizing of interface elements. The design is basic with moderate branding consistency. There is no evidence of a CMS or advanced frameworks. Performance and mobile optimization are basic, and accessibility features are minimal. No external analytics, advertising, or tracking technologies were detected. From a security perspective, the site lacks HTTPS information and security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are present. No incident response or security contact details are provided. The absence of WHOIS data and security best practices significantly lowers the trustworthiness and security posture of the site. Overall, the site is accessible and functional but suffers from critical legitimacy and security issues. Strategic recommendations include securing domain registration, implementing HTTPS, adding privacy and cookie policies, and providing verifiable business contact information to improve trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS GridJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The website targets a niche community of Chinese-speaking youth interested in technology discussions. Its business model is community-driven, relying on user-generated content through forums and chatrooms. The lack of business information and domain registration data suggests it may be an informal or hobbyist project rather than a commercial enterprise. There are no indications of partnerships, certifications, or monetization strategies. Growth potential depends on establishing legitimacy and trust through proper domain registration and compliance with privacy and security standards.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The current security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security headers, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no incident response mechanisms. The lack of WHOIS registration data further undermines trust. No vulnerabilities or malicious content were detected in the provided HTML, but the site is exposed to risks from lack of encryption and security best practices. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not evident. The site should prioritize securing domain ownership, enabling HTTPS, and publishing clear security and privacy policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Register or renew the domain to establish legitimate ownership.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

A Chinese language youth technology forum website providing discussion boards and chatroom features.

Key Services:
technology discussion forumschatroom communication
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS GridJavaScript
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:mailauth-reports@qq.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(372 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:45.200.17.100
Name Servers:
ns19.domaincontrol.com
ns20.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
10: mxbiz2.qq.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.mail.qq.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a simple but modern front-end stack with HTML5, CSS Grid for layout, and JavaScript for interactive resizing of UI components. The use of iframes for content segmentation is notable but may impact SEO and accessibility. No CMS or backend technologies are evident from the HTML. Performance is moderate with no heavy scripts detected. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. There is room for modernization by adopting responsive design frameworks, improving SEO metadata, and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website