Skip to main content

Is 25hours-hotels.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 25hours Hotels Reviews

25hours-hotels.com favicon

Is 25hours-hotels.com Safe? Security Analysis for 25hours Hotels

Check if 25hours-hotels.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityGermanymedium
WordPressGravity FormsThree.jsGoogle Tag ManagerBing Ads+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:51:33 PM
66
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

25hours Hotels operates a boutique hotel chain with 17 hotels across 13 cities, focusing on tailored experiences for each location. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for SEO and mobile devices, reflecting a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern libraries such as Three.js and integrates marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Bing Ads. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and domain transfer protection, though DNSSEC is not enabled and no explicit security policy or incident response contacts are published. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-positioned in the hospitality market, serving travelers seeking unique hotel experiences.

Detected Technologies

WordPressGravity FormsThree.jsGoogle Tag ManagerBing AdsYoast SEO

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company targets travelers and tourists seeking boutique hotel accommodations in major cities. Their business model centers on direct online bookings, gift vouchers, and brand engagement through a journal site. The market position is mid to upscale with a focus on design and location-specific tailoring. The website supports multiple languages, indicating an international customer base. Partnerships include a related journal domain. The company has a consistent brand presence and a long-established domain, supporting credibility and growth potential.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with strong SSL configuration and security headers, enhancing protection against common web threats. The domain status clientTransferProhibited prevents unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could improve DNS security. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy is found, and no direct security contact emails are published, which are areas for improvement. The cookie consent mechanism complies with GDPR requirements. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

25hours Hotels

Description:

25hours Hotels are 17 hotels in our thirteen favourite cities. Not merely ‘off the shelf’; they are tailored to each location. Book your 25hours hotel now.

Key Services:
Hotel accommodationGift vouchersOnline booking
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressGravity FormsThree.jsGoogle Tag ManagerBing AdsYoast SEO
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

excellent

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security headers

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag ManagerBing Ads
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Bing Ads
Marketing Tools:
Bing Ads
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

88/100
Score

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:151.193.18.41 ip4:78.137.112.222/31 ip4:78.137.112.224/27 include:spf.nextguest.app include:spf.synxis.com ip4:193.201.168.38/32 ip4:193.201.168.170/31 ip4:193.201.168.38 ip4:193.201.168.170 ip4:193.201.168.171 include:oracle.accor.com include: _spf.createsend.com include:spf.tmes.trendmicro.eu include:spf.exclaimer.net include:amazonses.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
19 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(484 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.66.202
Name Servers:
dns1.cscdns.net
dns2.cscdns.net
MX Records:
10: accor.in.tmes.trendmicro.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025042108, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:56ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:151.193.18.41 ip4:78.137.112.222/31 ip4:78.137.112.224/27 include:spf.nextguest.app include:spf.synxis.com ip4:193.201.168.38/32 ip4:193.201.168.170/31 ip4:193.201.168.38 ip4:193.201.168.170 ip4:193.201.168.171 include:oracle.accor.com include: _spf.createsend.com include:spf.tmes.trendmicro.eu include:spf.exclaimer.net include:amazonses.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with Gravity Forms for data collection and Three.js for interactive graphics. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Bing Ads for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible with good SEO practices including meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, likely due to rich media content and external scripts. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registrar is CSC Corporate Domains, Inc. The site uses modern fonts and preloading for performance optimization. No critical technical debt or outdated technologies were detected.
Analyze Another Website