Skip to main content

Is 268858.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 菲尼克斯矿山设备(上海)有限公司 Reviews

268858.com favicon

Is 268858.com Safe? Security Analysis for 菲尼克斯矿山设备(上海)有限公司

Check if 268858.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingChinamedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuerySwiper.js+1 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 7:15:14 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

菲尼克斯矿山设备(上海)有限公司是一家中美合资的专业矿山设备制造商,专注于破碎机、制砂机、移动破碎站及破碎筛分设备的研发、生产和销售。公司通过持续技术创新和优质客户服务,致力于为矿业客户提供高效、环保的破碎筛分解决方案。网站内容丰富,涵盖产品展示、客户案例、新闻资讯及在线客服,体现出较好的数字化成熟度和客户互动能力。技术上,网站采用主流前端技术如jQuery和Swiper,具备良好的移动端适配和用户体验,但缺乏部分安全头部配置和隐私合规声明。安全方面,网站未检测到明显漏洞,但缺少安全策略和隐私政策,且WHOIS信息缺失降低了域名的信任度。整体风险适中,建议加强合规性和安全防护措施以提升业务信誉和客户信任。

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuerySwiper.jsWOW.js

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

该公司定位于矿山设备制造行业,面向矿业企业和工程机械客户,业务涵盖设备制造及配套服务。其中美合资背景和丰富的产品线为其市场竞争力提供支撑。网站展示了较强的品牌一致性和专业形象,客户案例和新闻更新显示活跃的市场运营。合作伙伴和友情链接涵盖相关行业网站,反映一定的行业生态圈。缺乏公开的财务或注册信息限制了对其规模和增长的深入分析。整体业务模式以制造和服务为核心,目标客户明确,具备中型企业特征。

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

6*****@qq.com

Phone Numbers (3)

400*******
138*******
021*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

网站采用HTTPS协议,保证了基础的传输安全,但未检测到安全相关HTTP头部如CSP、HSTS等,存在提升空间。网站无明显敏感信息泄露,表单设计简单但缺少高级防护措施如验证码。缺乏隐私政策和Cookie管理,可能导致合规风险。WHOIS信息缺失是安全信任的重大隐患,建议尽快核实域名注册状态。整体安全成熟度中等,需加强安全策略公开和技术防护以降低潜在风险。

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

尽快核实并公开域名注册信息,确保WHOIS数据完整性。

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

菲尼克斯矿山设备(上海)有限公司

Description:

菲尼克斯矿山设备(上海)有限公司是中美合资企业,主营产品:破碎机、制砂机、移动破碎站、破碎筛分设备。公司专注于矿山设备的研发、生产、销售和服务,提供高效环保的破碎筛分解决方案。

Key Services:
破碎机制造制砂机制造移动破碎站破碎筛分设备售前咨询技术支持售后服务
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuerySwiper.jsWOW.js
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (URL is https)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Forms use basic input sanitization (no explicit vulnerabilities detected)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
在线客服系统 (ttkefu.com)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content in Chinese language.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 78 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

7 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(89 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:47.104.128.134
Name Servers:
ns3.myhostadmin.net
ns4.myhostadmin.net

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

网站基于标准HTML5和CSS3构建,使用jQuery、Swiper和WOW.js等流行前端库,支持响应式设计和动画效果,提升用户体验。页面结构清晰,导航合理,SEO元素如meta关键词和描述完善。缺少CMS标识,可能为定制开发。性能表现中等,未见明显优化措施如懒加载或资源压缩。无明显技术债务,但安全和合规方面存在不足。建议引入现代前端优化技术和安全最佳实践以提升整体技术水平。
Analyze Another Website