Skip to main content

Is 2drive.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - 2Drive.lv Reviews

2drive.lv favicon

Is 2drive.lv Safe? Security Analysis for 2Drive.lv

Check if 2drive.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+2 more
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:12:43 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

2Drive.lv is a small automotive service provider based in Riga, Latvia, specializing in car maintenance and repair services such as oil changes, brake repairs, tire services, and generator repairs. The company emphasizes customer care, transparency, and professionalism, offering online booking and multiple contact channels including email, phone, and social media. The website is built on the Webnode platform and hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, leveraging modern web technologies and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy with room for improvement in privacy and security disclosures.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCloudfront CDNWebnode CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business targets local car owners in Riga seeking reliable and honest automotive services. Its competitive advantage lies in personalized customer service and transparency, including photo/video reports of work done. The business model is service-oriented with direct customer engagement and online appointment booking. The company maintains an active presence on major social media platforms to engage customers. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified. The website content and structure support a small-sized local business with a focus on quality and customer trust. There is no evidence of e-commerce or large-scale operations. The company could benefit from enhanced privacy and security policies to strengthen customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@2drive.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712702****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent mechanism, indicating basic compliance with privacy regulations. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security contact information is published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. The use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but privacy compliance is basic due to missing privacy policy documentation. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

2Drive.lv

Description:

2Drive.lv is a car service located in Riga, Latvia, offering professional and reliable automotive repair and maintenance services. They emphasize customer care, transparency, and quality workmanship.

Key Services:
Oil changeBrake repairTire assembly and repairHanding over used tyresRepair of generators and startersCooling system maintenance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsCloudfront CDNWebnode CMS
Platforms:
Webnode website builder platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

7/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfuser.webnode.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 66 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:3.125.172.46, 3.73.27.108
Name Servers:
ns1.dns.lvDNS only
ns2.dns.lvDNS only
MX Records:
10: 2drive-lv0.mx1.mail3.webnode.page
20: 2drive-lv0.mx2.mail3.webnode.page
30: 2drive-lv0.mx3.mail3.webnode.page
SOA:Serial: 1738521058, TTL: 900s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:114ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:spfuser.webnode.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Webnode CMS platform, leveraging HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. It uses Amazon Cloudfront as a CDN for hosting static assets, which supports good performance and availability. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for tracking and marketing purposes. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and includes a cookie consent banner with advanced settings. However, the site lacks advanced accessibility features and some SEO enhancements could be improved. The absence of security headers and limited privacy documentation represent technical debt and compliance risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and functional but could benefit from security and privacy enhancements to reduce risk and improve user trust.
Analyze Another Website