Skip to main content

Is 365.now a Scam? Security Check Results - 365书签页 Reviews

3

Is 365.now Safe? Security Analysis for 365书签页

Check if 365.now is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1Open Sans fontWordPress Maintenance Plugin
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 9:51:04 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website 365.now, branded as '365书签页', is currently in maintenance mode and provides no active content or business information. It appears to be a Chinese language bookmark or portal site but lacks any detailed description, contact information, or service offerings. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with a maintenance plugin and uses common web technologies such as jQuery and Open Sans fonts. The site is accessible over HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and privacy compliance documentation. The login form is present but no advanced security measures are evident. Overall, the site is minimal and does not provide sufficient data to assess business operations or security posture comprehensively.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1Open Sans fontWordPress Maintenance Plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the maintenance status and lack of content, business intelligence is limited. The site targets general users likely interested in bookmarks or web portals in Chinese. No clear business model, market position, or revenue streams are identifiable. There are no partner or subsidiary domains linked, and no contact or legal information is provided. The site appears to be small scale with basic branding consistency but lacks trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is moderate but incomplete. HTTPS is used, which is a positive baseline. However, no security headers such as CSP, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options are detected, which reduces protection against common web attacks. The WordPress xmlrpc.php endpoint is exposed, which could be a vector for attacks if not properly secured. The login form uses POST but lacks visible anti-brute force protections or CAPTCHA. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not found.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

365书签页

Description:

The website appears to be a Chinese language bookmark or portal page named '365书签页'. The site is currently in maintenance mode and does not provide business description or services details.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.1jQuery Migrate 3.4.1Open Sans fontWordPress Maintenance Plugin
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS usage implied by URL (https://365.now)
  • Login form uses POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website is currently in maintenance mode with minimal content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:188.114.97.1, 188.114.96.1
AAAA Records:2606:4700:3033::6815:5b16, 2606:4700:3034::ac43:d07a
Name Servers:
aryanna.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
eugene.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2378715033, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:58ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses WordPress CMS with a maintenance mode plugin and standard web technologies like jQuery and Open Sans fonts. The site loads moderate performance assets and is mobile basic optimized. SEO and accessibility features are minimal. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider details are evident. The site lacks analytics or marketing tools, indicating low digital maturity. Technical debt is present in the form of missing security headers and incomplete compliance documentation. Modernization opportunities include improving security posture, adding privacy compliance, and enriching content and navigation.
Analyze Another Website