Skip to main content

Is 3dadstudio.com a Scam? Security Check Results - "3D AD" ltd Reviews

3dadstudio.com favicon

Is 3dadstudio.com Safe? Security Analysis for "3D AD" ltd

Check if 3dadstudio.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateLatviasmall
JavaScriptCSSFacebook Pixel
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:21:09 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

3D AD ltd is a small architecture and project management firm based in Latvia, specializing in architecture, interior design, and project management services. The company maintains partnerships with civil engineers, surveying firms, and construction companies, positioning itself as a local service provider in the real estate sector. The website reflects a professional presence with good design and clear navigation, targeting clients and partners in the construction and property development industries. Technically, the website is built on the Webnode platform, hosted via AWS Cloudfront CDN, and uses modern web technologies including JavaScript and CSS. It integrates Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for marketing and analytics purposes. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS and implements a cookie consent mechanism but lacks advanced security headers and privacy policy documentation, which are areas for improvement. The WHOIS data for the domain is missing, indicating potential registration issues that could affect trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and compliance measures.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSFacebook Pixel

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the real estate sector with a focus on architecture and project management. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting local clients and partners such as civil engineers and construction firms. The presence of partner logos and certifications like ARB-LAS suggests a credible network. The website content and structure indicate a small-sized enterprise with consistent branding and moderate market positioning. The lack of detailed WHOIS data and absence of contact emails or phone numbers on the site may limit direct client engagement and trust. The company leverages social media platforms for outreach and marketing. Growth opportunities may lie in expanding digital presence and improving compliance with privacy and security standards.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Physical Addresses (1)

Company Registration

Legal Name:

"3D AD" ltd

Registration Number:

40203213923

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent banner in place, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no security.txt or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are found. The use of third-party tracking scripts like Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, which should be managed carefully to comply with GDPR. The missing WHOIS data raises concerns about domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

"3D AD" ltd

Description:

Architecture, Interior design, Project management

Key Services:
ArchitectureInterior designProject management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSFacebook Pixel
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook Pixel
Marketing Tools:
Facebook Pixel
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:eu.zcsend.net -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:mail(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 49 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
4 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(264 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:3.73.27.108, 3.125.172.46
Name Servers:
ns1.register.it
ns2.register.it
MX Records:
1: 3dadstudio-com.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071607, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:231ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.mlsend.com include:eu.zcsend.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Webnode CMS platform and uses AWS Cloudfront CDN for content delivery, which supports good performance and scalability. The front-end employs standard web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with integration of Facebook Pixel and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and design quality. However, the absence of advanced security headers and limited SEO optimization indicate areas for technical improvement. The lack of WHOIS data suggests potential domain registration issues that should be addressed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small business but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website