Skip to main content

Is 3ks.de a Scam? Security Check Results - 3ks Reviews

3ks.de favicon

Is 3ks.de Safe? Security Analysis for 3ks

Check if 3ks.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Real EstateGermanysmall
UserCentrics (consent management)Font AwesomeContrexx CMS
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 12:34:45 PM
41
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

3ks is a German company specializing in construction and renovation products, notably profiles and their own brand arcadia®, including the Pergone® privacy, wind, and noise protection system. The website is primarily in German and targets professionals and customers in the construction and renovation sector. The business operates in a niche market with patented technology, positioning itself as a specialized provider in the real estate industry. Technically, the website uses the Contrexx CMS platform and integrates UserCentrics for cookie consent management, indicating some level of privacy compliance. However, the site lacks explicit privacy policies, terms of service, and contact information, which limits transparency and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS assumed but no visible security headers or advanced protections. Overall, the website is functional but basic in content quality and technical sophistication.

Detected Technologies

UserCentrics (consent management)Font AwesomeContrexx CMS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company appears to focus on manufacturing and selling patented construction profiles and privacy protection products under its own brand. The target market includes construction professionals and renovation customers in Germany. The business model is product-centric with a focus on innovation and patented technology. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies from the provided data. The website content is limited, with no visible certifications or trust signals such as testimonials or awards. The lack of contact details and legal pages may impact customer confidence and compliance with regulations.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@3ks.de

Phone Numbers (1)

+4999547******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. It integrates UserCentrics for cookie consent, indicating awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no security certifications are mentioned. The lack of visible contact channels for security incidents or abuse reports is a gap. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. Overall, the security maturity is basic and could be improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

3ks

Description:

3ks stands for profiles and the own brand arcadia®. The Pergone® is a reliable privacy, wind, and noise protection.

Key Services:
Profile manufacturingArcadia® brand productsPergone® privacy, wind, and noise protection
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
UserCentrics (consent management)Font AwesomeContrexx CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
50/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS assumed (URL is https)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
UserCentrics
Marketing Tools:
UserCentrics
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses UserCentrics for cookie consent management.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.hornetsecurity.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 75 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:195.226.185.65
Name Servers:
ns1a.dodns.net
ns2a.dodns.net
MX Records:
10: mx01.hornetsecurity.com
20: mx02.hornetsecurity.com
30: mx03.hornetsecurity.com
40: mx04.hornetsecurity.com
SOA:Serial: 2024061816, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:93ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.hornetsecurity.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Contrexx CMS platform and uses Font Awesome for icons. It integrates UserCentrics scripts for cookie consent management, which is a positive privacy feature. The site includes multiple favicon sizes for device compatibility. The HTML content is extensive but lacks modern SEO and accessibility features. Performance is likely moderate given the use of multiple CSS files and scripts. Mobile optimization is basic but present. No advanced frameworks or platforms like React or Angular were detected. Hosting provider details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Analyze Another Website