Skip to main content

Is 3route.io a Scam? Security Check Results - Baking Bad OU Reviews

3route.io favicon

Is 3route.io Safe? Security Analysis for Baking Bad OU

Check if 3route.io is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyEstoniasmall
Tailwind CSSBlazorJavaScript
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:32:10 PM
52
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

3Route is a specialized decentralized exchange (DEX) aggregator operating on the Tezos blockchain, providing users with optimized token swap routes across multiple liquidity pools and DEX platforms. The company Baking Bad OU, based in Estonia, operates the platform which was established in 2022. The service targets cryptocurrency traders seeking better execution prices and minimal slippage without additional fees beyond network costs. The website demonstrates a modern technical infrastructure using Blazor and Tailwind CSS, with good mobile optimization and clear navigation. Social media integration and a publicly available audit report enhance trust and transparency. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and domain transfer protections, though DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism. Overall, the platform shows a good balance of technical maturity and business credibility with room for improvement in security and privacy practices.

Detected Technologies

Tailwind CSSBlazorJavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

3Route occupies a niche position within the Tezos blockchain ecosystem as a DEX aggregator, leveraging partnerships with multiple Tezos-based DeFi projects to offer comprehensive liquidity access. Its business model focuses on providing value through trade optimization and routing without charging service fees, relying solely on network fees. The company Baking Bad OU is relatively new but well-aligned with the blockchain sector's growth. The platform's partnerships with recognized Tezos projects and active social media presence indicate a growing ecosystem integration. The lack of phone or physical address contact information suggests a lean startup structure typical in blockchain ventures. The public audit report and domain registration transparency support credibility, though GDPR compliance could be enhanced.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@3route.io

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protections, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents potential vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, limiting transparency in handling security events. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, reducing privacy risks. The publicly linked audit report by Inference adds a layer of security assurance. Overall, the security posture is moderate with clear areas for improvement in DNS security and security policy publication.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve overall domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Baking Bad OU

Description:

Next generation Tezos DEX aggregator with autorouting, better execution price, and minimal price impact. Uses liquidity from popular Tezos DEXes to provide token swaps with best prices and low slippage in one transaction.

Key Services:
DEX aggregationTrade optimizationToken swapping
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Tailwind CSSBlazorJavaScript
Frameworks:
Blazor
Platforms:
Tezos blockchain
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited
  • No additional fees charged (reduces attack surface on payments)

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_mailcust.gandi.net ?all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:?all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 79 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
2 years(established)
Expiry Risk
none(382 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:51.15.19.143
Name Servers:
ns-116-c.gandi.net
ns-12-a.gandi.net
ns-219-b.gandi.net
MX Records:
1: SMTP.GOOGLE.COM
10: spool.mail.gandi.net
50: fb.mail.gandi.net
SOA:Serial: 1756944000, TTL: 10800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_mailcust.gandi.net ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern frontend technology stack including Blazor for interactive UI and Tailwind CSS for styling, indicating a contemporary development approach. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO metadata including Open Graph and Twitter cards. Hosting and DNS are managed via Gandi SAS, a reputable registrar. Performance is moderate with no obvious blocking or errors. The absence of analytics scripts suggests a privacy-conscious design but limits insights into user behavior. The lack of CMS indicates a custom or framework-based site. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Analyze Another Website