Is 4everland.org Safe? Security Analysis for 4EVERLAND - A Cloud Computing Platform of WEB 3.0
Check if 4everland.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
4EVERLAND is a technology-focused Web 3.0 cloud computing platform that integrates storage, computing, and network core capabilities. The website presents a modern technical infrastructure using Vue.js and Nuxt.js frameworks, with Google Tag Manager implemented for analytics. However, the site lacks visible privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information, which limits transparency and user trust. The WHOIS data is inaccessible, which further reduces confidence in the domain's legitimacy. Security posture is basic with no evident security headers or policies, and SSL configuration details are not available from the provided data. Overall, the site is accessible and safe for general audiences but requires improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business transparency to enhance trustworthiness and compliance.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The business operates in the technology sector, targeting users interested in Web 3.0 cloud computing services. The platform offers core services including storage, computing, and network integration. The business model appears to be service-oriented cloud computing, likely targeting developers and enterprises in the blockchain and decentralized technology space. The website content is basic but relevant, with moderate branding consistency. There is no evidence of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent companies from the provided data. The lack of contact and policy information may impact customer confidence and regulatory compliance.
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The current security posture is minimal. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed; no security headers are detected in the HTML content. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security certifications. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. The use of Google Tag Manager introduces moderate user tracking, but no explicit privacy compliance mechanisms are visible. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a concern for domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security maturity is low, and improvements are needed in security headers, privacy compliance, and incident response readiness.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations and verify via security headers.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
4EVERLAND is a Web 3.0 cloud computing platform that integrates storage, computing, and network core capabilities.
basic
moderate
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
basic
Security Assessment
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
WHOIS data is unavailable or blocked, limiting domain trust analysis.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
No Data Protection Officer mentioned
LOWLarge organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR
Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant
MEDIUMPrivacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
DMARC not enforcing
MEDIUMDMARC policy is set to "none"
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 67 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 2 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Certificate Details
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled
MEDIUMDomain can be transferred without authorization
Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled
LOWDomain can be deleted without additional verification
DMARC Policy Set to None
LOWDMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy
Domain Registration Details
- •No domain protection locks enabled
- •Privacy/proxy registration detected
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings