Skip to main content

Is 51cto.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 51cto.com Reviews

5

Is 51cto.com Safe? Security Analysis for 51cto.com

Check if 51cto.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinalarge
JavaScript
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 2:42:09 AM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website 51cto.com appears to be a mature domain registered since 2005 under Alibaba Cloud Computing (Beijing) Co., Ltd. registrar. However, the provided HTML content is minimal and obfuscated, indicating that the site content is likely blocked or protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security mechanism. Due to this, no meaningful metadata, contact information, or business content could be extracted. The domain age and registrar suggest legitimacy, but the lack of accessible content limits the ability to assess the business model, services, or compliance posture. Technically, the site uses JavaScript but no other detectable frameworks or CMS. Security headers and SSL configuration details are not available, and no privacy or cookie policies were found. Overall, the site’s security posture and privacy compliance cannot be fully evaluated due to content access restrictions.

Detected Technologies

JavaScript

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the domain age and registrar, 51cto.com likely operates in the technology sector, possibly providing IT or developer-related content or services. The absence of visible content prevents detailed analysis of market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The domain’s longevity suggests an established presence in its market. No business contact details or certifications were found to support credibility or trust. The hosting by Alibaba Cloud indicates a robust infrastructure provider but does not clarify the business ownership or operational details.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture assessment is limited by the lack of accessible content. No security headers or SSL details were provided, and DNSSEC is not enabled. The obfuscated JavaScript and minimal HTML suggest a WAF or security challenge is in place, which is a positive security control but also restricts analysis. No vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies were found. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which aligns with typical business practices. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security and privacy policies, and improving transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and verify HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and publish related security headers.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Minimal HTML content with obfuscated JavaScript and no visible page content indicates possible WAF or security challenge blocking full content access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScript

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and likely blocked by a WAF or security mechanism.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_report@qiye.163.com
Forensic Reports:dmarc@qiye.163.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
20 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(236 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:60.28.220.199
Name Servers:
vip3.alidns.com
vip4.alidns.com
MX Records:
5: hzmx01.mxmail.netease.com
10: hzmx02.mxmail.netease.com
SOA:Serial: 2025080107, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:104ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical footprint is minimal with only obfuscated JavaScript detected in the head section. No CMS or frameworks are identifiable from the provided snippet. Hosting is via Alibaba Cloud, a reputable provider. The site appears to be protected by a WAF or similar security mechanism, which limits content visibility. No performance or SEO data is available. The lack of metadata and structured data reduces SEO effectiveness and user experience. Modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving accessibility, and enhancing mobile optimization once content is accessible.
Analyze Another Website