Skip to main content

Is 51tcp.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 河南梯斯网络科技有限公司 Reviews

51tcp.com favicon

Is 51tcp.com Safe? Security Analysis for 河南梯斯网络科技有限公司

Check if 51tcp.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyChinasmall
Astro v4.0.6CSSWebP images
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:57:20 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

河南梯斯网络科技有限公司 operates the website 51tcp.com, presenting itself as a technology company specializing in network infrastructure services, including a large backbone node network and national cryptography level IP isolation. The company targets business and technical users in China, providing software downloads and a customer control panel. The website is built using the Astro framework and employs modern web technologies but lacks advanced SEO, accessibility, and security features. The domain is registered with DNSPod, Inc., a reputable Chinese DNS provider, and the domain age aligns with the company's founding year of 2017. Official Chinese regulatory licenses are displayed, enhancing trustworthiness. However, the site lacks privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and security headers, which are areas for improvement.

Detected Technologies

Astro v4.0.6CSSWebP images

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company positions itself as a regional technology service provider in China, focusing on network infrastructure with a significant backbone node presence and cryptographic IP isolation. Its business model appears to be service-oriented, targeting enterprises requiring secure and reliable network solutions. The absence of detailed contact information and limited external partnerships visible on the site suggest a focused but possibly small-scale operation. The presence of official ICP and telecom licenses indicates regulatory compliance within China. The company uses a modern web framework but has room to enhance its digital maturity through improved SEO, accessibility, and security practices.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a basic security posture. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed in the provided data. No security headers such as Content Security Policy or HSTS are detected, and DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose the domain to DNS spoofing risks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosures, incident response contacts, or security policies published on the site. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR or similar regulations. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to implement DNSSEC, security headers, and publish relevant policies to improve trust and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

河南梯斯网络科技有限公司

Description:

The company appears to provide network technology services, emphasizing a large backbone node network (10000+ nodes) and national cryptography level IP isolation.

Key Services:
Backbone network nodesNational cryptography level IP isolationSoftware downloadsControl panel access for customers
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Astro v4.0.6CSSWebP images
Frameworks:
Astro
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Soon

HIGH

SSL certificate expires in 29 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(198 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:1.14.108.21
Name Servers:
f1g1ns1.dnspod.net
f1g1ns2.dnspod.net
MX Records:
5: mxbiz1.qq.com
5: mxbiz2.qq.com
SOA:Serial: 1751994403, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:446ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses the Astro framework version 4.0.6, indicating a modern static site generation approach. The use of WebP images suggests optimization efforts for performance. However, the site lacks advanced SEO meta tags and accessibility features. No analytics or tracking scripts are detected, which may limit marketing insights but improves privacy. Hosting and DNS are managed by DNSPod, Inc., a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. The absence of security headers and DNSSEC represents technical debt and potential security risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security configurations.
Analyze Another Website