Skip to main content

Is 51tracking.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 51Tracking Reviews

51tracking.com favicon

Is 51tracking.com Safe? Security Analysis for 51Tracking

Check if 51tracking.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationChinamedium
jQuery 2.1.4UIkit CSS/JS frameworkUdesk live chatBaidu Analytics
Analyzed 8/2/2025Completed 6:27:51 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

51Tracking is a Chinese-based enterprise specializing in cross-border logistics API services, providing tracking solutions for over 1000 domestic and international couriers. The platform targets businesses requiring batch tracking and real-time logistics updates, positioning itself as a leading logistics API provider with a strong market presence evidenced by extensive customer testimonials and a high API success rate. Technically, the website employs a modern UIkit framework with jQuery and integrates Baidu Analytics and Udesk live chat for user engagement. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured, offering a professional user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and claims ISO27001 certification, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain transparency and slightly impacts trust. Overall, the site is professional and trustworthy but could enhance privacy compliance and security posture.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 2.1.4UIkit CSS/JS frameworkUdesk live chatBaidu Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates a B2B SaaS model focused on logistics tracking APIs, serving a medium-sized enterprise market primarily in China. It leverages partnerships with major logistics providers and cross-border e-commerce platforms, enhancing its competitive advantage. The business model relies on API usage fees and affiliate programs. The presence of extensive customer testimonials and partner logos indicates a mature ecosystem and strong market acceptance. Growth indicators include high cumulative query volumes and API request counts. Strategic observations suggest opportunities in expanding privacy compliance and incident response transparency to strengthen market trust.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

s*****@51tracking.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate to strong security posture with HTTPS enforced and ISO27001 certification claimed. However, the lack of HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. Forms include client-side validation but lack visible CAPTCHA or advanced bot mitigation. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms may pose GDPR compliance risks. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but can be improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy controls, and incident response disclosures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

51Tracking

Description:

51Tracking is an international express tracking platform supporting over 1000 domestic and international couriers, offering batch tracking services and professional, stable logistics API interfaces.

Key Services:
API & Webhook logistics tracking servicesBatch tracking for 1000+ couriersLogistics status notifications and alertsData analytics and reporting
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 2.1.4UIkit CSS/JS frameworkUdesk live chatBaidu Analytics
Frameworks:
UIkit
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of ISO27001 security framework
  • Secure forms with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Baidu Analytics
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Baidu Analytics
Marketing Tools:
Udesk live chat
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

3 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

60/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
10 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(792 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:120.24.188.125, 120.77.209.5, 39.108.101.179, 120.77.176.207, 119.23.77.161
Name Servers:
ns3.dnsv3.com
ns4.dnsv3.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a stable and widely adopted technology stack including jQuery 2.1.4 and UIkit for UI components. Integration with Baidu Analytics and Udesk live chat indicates a focus on user engagement and analytics. The site is mobile responsive and SEO optimized with proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with no critical issues detected. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include updating jQuery to a newer version and adding progressive web app features. The site is hosted on an unknown provider with no CDN explicitly detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business needs effectively with room for incremental improvements.
Analyze Another Website