Skip to main content

Is 755fl.com a Scam? Security Check Results - 755fl.com Reviews

755fl.com favicon

Is 755fl.com Safe? Security Analysis for Classical Art

Check if 755fl.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
HTML5CSS
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 2:22:18 AM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website art.755fl.com is an informational platform dedicated to classical art, offering multilingual content including artist profiles, artworks, art movements, and galleries. It targets art enthusiasts and researchers with a niche focus on cultural and historical art content. The business model appears to be content-driven, possibly supported by advertising or partnerships, but lacks explicit commercial or transactional features. Technically, the site uses basic HTML and CSS with no detected CMS or advanced frameworks. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices but lacks advanced accessibility features. Security posture is basic with HTTPS enabled but no security headers or advanced protections detected. Privacy and compliance policies are absent, and contact information is limited to a contact form without direct emails or phone numbers. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and registration status. Overall, the site is functional but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and business transparency to enhance trust and professionalism.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The site occupies a niche in the classical art informational space with multilingual reach, which may help attract a diverse audience. However, the lack of clear business identity, contact details, and WHOIS registration data limits credibility. The external links suggest partnerships with related arts and travel domains, but some linked domains appear suspicious and warrant further review. The business model is likely informational and content-based, with no clear revenue streams identified. Growth potential depends on improving trust signals, compliance, and expanding content quality and engagement features.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity is low to moderate. HTTPS is implemented, which is a positive baseline. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces protection against common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. The site uses a contact form but lacks secure input validation indicators. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The missing WHOIS data is a significant risk factor, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy protection that is not justified. Overall, the site should prioritize implementing security headers, privacy policies, and improving domain registration transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Website providing information and appreciation of classical art, including artists, artworks, art movements, and galleries with multilingual support.

Key Services:
Art articlesArtist profilesArtwork galleriesArt movement informationMultilingual content
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
55/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Form uses POST method

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website content is fully accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

0/100
Score

Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

CRITICAL

Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

5 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:104.21.87.116, 172.67.143.7
AAAA Records:2a06:98c1:3121::1, 2a06:98c1:3120::1
Name Servers:
asa.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
titan.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
SOA:Serial: 2379392290, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:94ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using basic HTML5 and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. It serves static content with multilingual support via subdomains. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images but no advanced optimization techniques detected. The site lacks analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. There is no evidence of modern JavaScript frameworks or CDN usage. The absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in security and compliance areas. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not discernible from the content. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but basic, with room for modernization and security enhancements.
Analyze Another Website