Skip to main content

Is a2la.org a Scam? Security Check Results - A2LA Reviews

a2la.org favicon

Is a2la.org Safe? Security Analysis for A2LA

Check if a2la.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentUnited Stateslarge
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsBootstrap 4.6AOS (Animate On Scroll)+3 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 11:37:53 PM
65
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

A2LA is a well-established accreditation body founded in 1996, providing comprehensive accreditation services across multiple industries including laboratory testing, inspection bodies, product certification, and proficiency testing. The organization targets laboratories, individuals, and organizations seeking quality assurance and accreditation, positioning itself as a trusted leader with a broad portfolio of ISO-based accreditation programs. The website reflects a mature digital presence with professional design, clear navigation, and extensive content relevant to its audience. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern frameworks and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, demonstrating digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforcement and domain security measures, though improvements are recommended in security policy transparency and cookie consent mechanisms. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and well-aligned with its business objectives.

Detected Technologies

WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsBootstrap 4.6AOS (Animate On Scroll)jQueryFontAwesomeSalesforce Embedded Service Chat

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

A2LA operates in the government and quality assurance sector, leveraging its long domain history and multiple ISO accreditations to maintain a strong market position. Its business model includes accreditation services, membership benefits, training, and certification programs. The company benefits from strategic partnerships with Salesforce for customer engagement and uses advanced marketing and analytics tools to support growth. The presence of customer testimonials and detailed program descriptions enhances credibility. The organization targets a specialized audience requiring compliance and quality validation, which supports stable revenue streams and industry influence.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@A2LA.org

Phone Numbers (1)

301*******

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a good security maturity level with HTTPS, domain transfer protections, and no visible sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit security policies, incident response information, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms, which are important for transparency and trust. The absence of a cookie consent mechanism may pose compliance risks under GDPR and similar regulations. The use of third-party marketing and analytics tools introduces moderate tracking but is managed professionally. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing security policies, and implementing cookie consent to enhance compliance and user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

A2LA

Description:

A2LA empowers laboratories, individuals & organizations to participate in the development of accreditation. Explore our laboratory accreditation services.

Key Services:
Laboratory accreditationInspection body accreditationProduct certification body accreditationProficiency testing provider accreditationReference materials producer accreditationClinical testing laboratory accreditationBiobanking accreditationTraining and membership services
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressYoast SEOGoogle AnalyticsBootstrap 4.6AOS (Animate On Scroll)jQueryFontAwesomeSalesforce Embedded Service Chat
Frameworks:
Genesis Framework (WordPress theme)
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited domain status
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by WordPress ecosystem)

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsLinkedIn InsightFacebook PixelBing UETPardot
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Bing AdsFacebook AdsLinkedIn Ads
Tracking Pixels:
Facebook PixelLinkedIn Insight TagBing UET
Marketing Tools:
Pardot Marketing AutomationCallRail
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is professionally designed and well-structured.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

47/100
Score

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:red8gtvyy7.powerspf.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:jsp0gk9upf@rua.powerdmarc.com
Forensic Reports:jsp0gk9upf@ruf.powerdmarc.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 46 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
28 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2202 days)
Protection Level
moderateDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.11, 141.193.213.10
Name Servers:
ns10.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns11.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns12.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns13.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns14.dnsmadeeasy.com
ns15.dnsmadeeasy.com
MX Records:
10: smtp1-mke.securence.com
10: smtp1-msp.securence.com
SOA:Serial: 2009010329, TTL: 180s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:red8gtvyy7.powerspf.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a WordPress CMS using the Genesis Framework, enhanced with Yoast SEO for search optimization. It employs modern front-end libraries including Bootstrap 4.6, AOS for animations, and FontAwesome for icons. Analytics and marketing integrations include Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight, Bing UET, Pardot, and CallRail, indicating a sophisticated marketing stack. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and moderate performance. Hosting details are not explicit but domain registrar is Tucows. The technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from enhanced security headers and DNSSEC implementation.
Analyze Another Website