Skip to main content

Is abl.de a Scam? Security Check Results - ABL Reviews

abl.de favicon

Is abl.de Safe? Security Analysis for ABL

Check if abl.de is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyGermanymedium
Bootstrap (CSS)jQueryVideo.jsLottie (bodymovin)Google Tag Manager+1 more
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 7:21:54 PM
59
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ABL is a well-established German family-owned company specializing in electrical connectivity products and e-mobility charging solutions. Founded in 1923, it holds a pioneering position in the industry, notably as the originator of the SCHUKO plug standard. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image targeting private, semi-public, and public sectors interested in electrical and e-mobility products. Technically, the site employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with a cookie consent mechanism implemented via Klaro and analytics managed through Google Tag Manager. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacks explicit security headers and published policies. No blocking or WAF mechanisms interfere with content access.

Detected Technologies

Bootstrap (CSS)jQueryVideo.jsLottie (bodymovin)Google Tag ManagerKlaro (cookie consent)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates primarily in the energy and transportation sectors, manufacturing wallboxes, charging stations, and international standard socket outlets. Its market position is that of a pioneer and trusted family business with a medium-sized footprint. The business model focuses on product manufacturing and distribution to various sectors including private and public clients. The website's content and structure support clear navigation and professional presentation, although contact and policy disclosures are limited. The presence of Google Tag Manager indicates active marketing and analytics efforts. No suspicious or unrelated domains are linked, supporting a focused business ecosystem.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is used, and cookie consent is managed properly. However, there is a lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. No explicit privacy policy or incident response contacts are published, which may pose compliance risks under GDPR and related regulations. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager is standard but requires monitoring for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be improved with enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ABL

Description:

ABL gehört zu den Pionieren der Elektromobilität. Das unabhängige Familienunternehmen aus Franken produziert Wallboxen und Ladesäulen für den privaten, halböffentlichen und öffentlichen Einsatz. Mit seinen eMobility-Produkten knüpft ABL an die technologische Tradition des Unternehmens an. Firmengründer Albert Büttner entwickelte 1925 den SCHUKO-Stecker, heute der weltweit meistverbreitete Standard für Steckvorrichtungen.

Key Services:
production of wallboxesproduction of charging stationsmanufacture of international standard socket outlets and plugs
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Bootstrap (CSS)jQueryVideo.jsLottie (bodymovin)Google Tag ManagerKlaro (cookie consent)
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URL https://www.abl.de/de/)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Referrer-Policy configuration

LOW

Current value: "same-origin"

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

48/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:my355154.mail.crm.ondemand.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc@abl.de

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

67/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
none
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:62.91.9.16
Name Servers:
a.ns14.net
b.ns14.net
c.ns14.net
d.ns14.net
MX Records:
1: SMTP.GOOGLE.COM
SOA:Serial: 2025021800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:109ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:my355154.mail.crm.ondemand.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and stable technology stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Video.js for media handling, and Lottie for animations. Google Tag Manager is integrated for analytics and marketing. The site appears mobile-optimized with good navigation clarity and SEO meta tags. However, no explicit CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Performance is moderate with deferred and async script loading. Accessibility features are basic but present. Technical debt appears low, though improvements in security headers and policy disclosures are recommended to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website