Skip to main content

Is aboenergy.pl a Scam? Security Check Results - ABO Energy Reviews

aboenergy.pl favicon

Is aboenergy.pl Safe? Security Analysis for ABO Energy

Check if aboenergy.pl is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyPolandmedium
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 1.8.3Matomo Analytics
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 3:54:56 PM
45
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

ABO Energy is an international renewable energy company specializing in the development, construction, and operation of wind, solar, energy storage, and green hydrogen projects. The company has a presence in Poland since 2019, managing projects with approximately 1 GW capacity. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and provides comprehensive information about the company's services, projects, and corporate values. Technical infrastructure includes modern web technologies and privacy-conscious analytics (Matomo) with cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, though some improvements in security headers and library updates are recommended. The absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable concern but is mitigated by the professional presentation and external media references. Overall, the website reflects a credible and trustworthy business with room for technical and security enhancements.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 1.8.3Matomo Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ABO Energy operates in the renewable energy sector with a focus on wind and solar power, energy storage, and green hydrogen. The company targets investors, landowners, local communities, and renewable energy stakeholders. Its business model encompasses full project lifecycle management from site assessment to operational maintenance. The company leverages international partnerships and maintains a recruitment subdomain for talent acquisition. Media coverage and press releases indicate active market engagement and growth. The company positions itself as a sustainable energy provider with a medium-sized footprint in Poland and broader international operations.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and privacy-respecting analytics. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and the use of an outdated jQuery version present potential vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but no dedicated vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present. Overall, the security risks are moderate and manageable with recommended improvements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ABO Energy

Description:

ABO Energy develops and builds projects related to wind and solar energy, energy storage, and green hydrogen systems across four continents. The company started operations in Poland in 2019 and manages projects totaling about 1 GW capacity. ABO Energy handles all stages from site assessment, planning, engineering, financing, construction, grid connection to operational management.

Key Services:
Wind energy project developmentSolar energy project developmentEnergy storage solutionsGreen hydrogen systemsOperational management and maintenance
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS3JavaScriptjQuery 1.8.3Matomo Analytics
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner with opt-out
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Matomo analytics with disabled cookies

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Matomo
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Matomo
Marketing Tools:
Matomo Analytics
Transparency Level:good

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=15768000; includeSubDomains"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

50/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:188.172.123.196 ip4:37.64.168.250 ip4:85.214.99.153 ip4:81.169.253.123 ip4:81.169.162.35 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.hornetsecurity.com include:mail.pi-asp.de include:_spf.meltwater.com include:spf-inm.eqs-service.com include :mailgun.org include:o1.ptr1305.skillcast.com -all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 38 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:88.198.64.212
Name Servers:
ns1046.ui-dns.comDNS only
ns1095.ui-dns.bizDNS only
ns1102.ui-dns.orgDNS only
ns1103.ui-dns.deDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx02.hornetsecurity.com
30: mx03.hornetsecurity.com
40: mx04.hornetsecurity.com
10: mx01.hornetsecurity.com
SOA:Serial: 2017060175, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:71ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:188.172.123.196 ip4:37.64.168.250 ip4:85.214.99.153 ip4:81.169.253.123 ip4:81.169.162.35 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.hornetsecurity.com include:mail.pi-asp.de include:_spf.meltwater.com include:spf-inm.eqs-service.com include :mailgun.org include:o1.ptr1305.skillcast.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery 1.8.3, which is outdated and should be updated. The site is mobile-optimized and includes accessibility features at a basic level. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Analytics are handled via Matomo with cookies disabled, reflecting privacy-conscious design. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. The site could benefit from modern frameworks and enhanced accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website