Skip to main content

Is abstractvc.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Abstract Reviews

abstractvc.com favicon

Is abstractvc.com Safe? Security Analysis for Abstract

Check if abstractvc.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceUnited Stateslarge
WordPressjQueryYoast SEO pluginSearch Filter Pro plugin
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 7:27:14 PM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Abstract is a San Francisco-based venture capital firm managing approximately $1.8 billion in assets. The firm operates sector-agnostically, focusing on seed and early-stage investments. Their reputation is built on strong founder relationships, extensive connections, and a commitment to helping startups succeed. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting founders and investors in the startup ecosystem. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with common plugins and custom fonts, delivering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. No contact or incident response information is provided, which could impact trust and compliance. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve in privacy compliance and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPressjQueryYoast SEO pluginSearch Filter Pro plugin

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Abstract holds a strong market position as a large venture capital firm with a broad investment scope. Their business model centers on early-stage startup funding and founder support, leveraging a network-driven approach. The absence of detailed contact or compliance information on the website suggests a focus on selective engagement rather than broad public outreach. The presence of a dedicated jobs subdomain indicates active recruitment and growth. The firm’s digital presence is professional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and compliance disclosures to align with industry best practices.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options represents a missed opportunity to harden the site against common web attacks. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure, incident response contacts, or security policies reduces the site's security maturity. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also raises compliance concerns, particularly regarding GDPR. While no vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected, the site would benefit from implementing these security best practices to enhance trust and resilience.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to improve compliance.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Abstract

Description:

Abstract is a venture capital firm based in San Francisco with $1.8 billion in assets under management. We are sector-agnostic and invest in seed and early stage companies. Our reputation among founders is built on fierce loyalty, unparalleled connections, and a relentless drive to help them win.

Key Services:
venture capital fundingfounder supportnetwork connections
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressjQueryYoast SEO pluginSearch Filter Pro plugin
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

80/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1416-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1299 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.10, 141.193.213.11
Name Servers:
ns1cvw.name.com
ns2bkr.name.com
ns3jwx.name.com
ns4bht.name.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
40: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
50: aspmx3.googlemail.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1595028588, TTL: 300s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:76ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing jQuery and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization. Custom fonts are loaded from the site’s own domain, reducing third-party dependencies. The site uses standard WordPress plugins for search filtering and UI components. Performance is moderate with deferred script loading and responsive design elements. However, the absence of advanced security headers and limited privacy compliance features indicate areas for technical improvement. Hosting provider details are not disclosed, and no CDN or advanced caching mechanisms were detected. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional business presence but could be modernized with enhanced security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website