Skip to main content

Is abtimbergroup.com a Scam? Security Check Results - AB Timber Group Reviews

abtimbergroup.com favicon

Is abtimbergroup.com Safe? Security Analysis for AB Timber Group

Check if abtimbergroup.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
JavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:09:15 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

AB Timber Group is a family-owned wood processing company established in 1999 and located in Riga, Latvia. The company specializes in timber and wood processing services, targeting businesses and clients in the manufacturing sector. The website is built on the Weblium platform and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics. The technical infrastructure is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks security headers and DNSSEC. Privacy compliance is poor due to absence of privacy and cookie policies. The domain is newly registered in 2024, which is inconsistent with the company's founding year, suggesting a recent domain acquisition or rebranding. Overall, the website is professional and safe but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on wood and timber processing. It maintains a consistent brand presence with a clear business model targeting the European market, specifically Latvia. The website content is relevant and professional but lacks detailed contact information and trust indicators such as certifications or testimonials. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates moderate digital marketing efforts. The domain's recent registration may reflect a strategic move to modernize or expand digital presence. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified from the website data.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (2)

i*****@abtimbergroup.com
G*****@abtimbergroup.com.si

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks critical security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could expose it to certain web attacks. DNSSEC is not enabled, reducing DNS security. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is found. The use of third-party scripts like Google Tag Manager introduces moderate tracking but no known vulnerabilities are detected. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers and policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

AB Timber Group

Description:

AB Timber Group is family owned wood processing company that was founded in 1999. The company is located in the heart of the capital of Latvia (EU) – Port of Riga.

Key Services:
wood processingtimber products
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptGoogle Tag Manager
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

75/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=2592000"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 64 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

45/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: elltbhzw64hbtgu6a6vx7vl5s6jaot3ycv2hu3kfhs4yasvoaoaa.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(141 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:35.187.82.108
Name Servers:
ns1.weblium.com
ns2.weblium.com
ns3.weblium.com
ns4.weblium.com
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
15: elltbhzw64hbtgu6a6vx7vl5s6jaot3ycv2hu3kfhs4yasvoaoaa.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2024010710, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:105ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using the Weblium CMS platform and includes JavaScript libraries such as Google Tag Manager for analytics. Hosting is provided via Weblium's nameservers. The site uses modern web standards with responsive design and basic SEO meta tags. Performance is moderate with preloading of CSS and asynchronous loading of scripts. Accessibility features are basic but present. No advanced frameworks or server-side technologies are detected from the HTML content. The domain is newly registered, which may indicate recent site launch or migration.
Analyze Another Website