Skip to main content

Is accessibilityserver.org a Scam? Security Check Results - accessibilityserver.org Reviews

A

Is accessibilityserver.org Safe? Security Analysis for accessibilityserver.org

Check if accessibilityserver.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statessmall
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 2:52:28 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website accessibilityserver.org presents a minimalistic landing page with only a single text line indicating it is an 'Accessibility Widget Server'. The domain is registered since 2020 and uses privacy protection services, with hosting DNS managed by Amazon AWS. There is no additional content, metadata, or business information available on the site, indicating it is either a placeholder or a very early-stage project. The lack of privacy policies, contact information, and security headers suggests a low level of digital maturity and compliance. Security posture is weak due to missing HTTPS and security best practices, and no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. Overall, the site has low trustworthiness and limited business credibility.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind accessibilityserver.org appears to be a small technology service focused on providing an accessibility widget server. The lack of detailed business information, contact details, or certifications limits the ability to assess market positioning or competitive advantages. The domain age is consistent with a startup or small project. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The business model and revenue streams are unclear due to minimal content. The target audience is likely developers or website owners seeking accessibility solutions, but this is not explicitly stated.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, and DNSSEC is not enabled. The domain uses privacy protection, which is common but reduces transparency. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response policies are published. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No scripts or third-party libraries were detected, reducing attack surface but also indicating minimal functionality. Overall, the site is at risk of trust and compliance issues.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate and enforce secure connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Accessibility Widget Server

Key Services:
Accessibility Widget Server
Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is extremely minimal with only a single text line 'Accessibility Widget Server'.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

85/100
Score

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:63f012ebc8@rua.easydmarc.us
Forensic Reports:63f012ebc8@ruf.easydmarc.us

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(156 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:3.174.113.103, 3.174.113.57, 3.174.113.98, 3.174.113.78
Name Servers:
ns-1129.awsdns-13.org
ns-147.awsdns-18.com
ns-1899.awsdns-45.co.uk
ns-668.awsdns-19.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:52ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is extremely minimal with no detectable CMS, frameworks, or scripts. Hosting DNS is managed by Amazon AWS, indicating a reliable infrastructure base. The HTML is valid but lacks meta tags, SEO optimization, and accessibility features beyond the minimal text. Performance is likely moderate due to minimal content but mobile optimization and user experience are poor. There is significant opportunity to modernize the site with better technical implementation, including responsive design, SEO metadata, and accessibility compliance.
Analyze Another Website