Skip to main content

Is accessiblemeds.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Association for Accessible Medicines Reviews

accessiblemeds.org favicon

Is accessiblemeds.org Safe? Security Analysis for Association for Accessible Medicines

Check if accessiblemeds.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HealthcareUnited Statesmedium
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Custom SearchjQuery+1 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 5:38:23 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM) is a US-based non-profit advocacy organization focused on promoting access to generic and biosimilar medicines. The website serves as a comprehensive resource hub offering advocacy information, reports, blogs, and event details targeting patients, policymakers, and industry stakeholders. The organization positions itself as a trusted authority in pharmaceutical advocacy with a strong emphasis on education and policy influence. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using Elementor and Yoast SEO, with modern web technologies and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, though DNSSEC is not configured and security headers are not evident. Privacy and cookie policies are not explicitly found, indicating room for compliance improvement. Overall, the site is professional, content-rich, and trustworthy, with a moderate to high AI score reflecting good business credibility and technical implementation.

Detected Technologies

WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Custom SearchjQueryGoogle Tag Manager

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AAM operates in the healthcare and non-profit sectors, advocating for affordable medicines through education, policy advocacy, and industry collaboration. Their business model relies on membership, advocacy campaigns, and publishing authoritative data. The organization maintains partnerships with related biosimilar councils and resource centers, enhancing its ecosystem. The domain age and WHOIS data align with the organization's founding timeline, supporting legitimacy. The website's content strategy includes regular updates, reports, and multimedia resources, targeting a broad audience from patients to policymakers. The lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies suggests an area for regulatory compliance enhancement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@accessiblemeds.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS queries to spoofing. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, limiting transparency in security management. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were identified in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be strengthened by implementing additional security headers, DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Association for Accessible Medicines

Description:

The Association for Accessible Medicines (AAM) works to ensure that more generic and biosimilar medicines are accessible to more people who need them.

Key Services:
Advocacy for generic and biosimilar medicinesProviding data and education to policymakersPublishing reports and white papersHosting events and conferencesMaintaining biosimilars council
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressElementorYoast SEOGoogle Custom SearchjQueryGoogle Tag Manager
Frameworks:
Elementor
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security status domain flags in WHOIS

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Marketing Tools:
Google Custom Search
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is a professional non-profit advocacy site for generic and biosimilar medicines

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

58/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:23.103.224.0/19 ip4:206.191.224.0/19 ip4:40.103.0.0/16 ip4:64.128.103.72/32 ip4:205.201.42.103/32 ip4:64.132.221.30/32 include:spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.intacct.com -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:Administrator@gphaonline.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
8 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(134 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:141.193.213.11, 141.193.213.10
Name Servers:
ns49.domaincontrol.com
ns50.domaincontrol.com
MX Records:
0: d326693a.ess.barracudanetworks.com
10: d326693b.ess.barracudanetworks.com
SOA:Serial: 2025071601, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:174ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:23.103.224.0/19 ip4:206.191.224.0/19 ip4:40.103.0.0/16 ip4:64.128.103.72/32 ip4:205.201.42.103/32 ip4:64.132.221.30/32 include:spf.ess.barracudanetworks.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.intacct.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using Elementor for page building and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It integrates Google Custom Search and Google Tag Manager for search and analytics functionality. The site demonstrates good mobile responsiveness and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no major issues detected in the HTML content. The domain is registered with GoDaddy and uses domain privacy protection, which is common and justified for this type of organization. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers represents technical debt that should be addressed to improve security posture. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid and supports the organization's digital presence effectively.
Analyze Another Website