Skip to main content

Is acmeticketing.com a Scam? Security Check Results - ACME Ticketing Reviews

acmeticketing.com favicon

Is acmeticketing.com Safe? Security Analysis for ACME Ticketing

Check if acmeticketing.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/asmall
WordPressDivi ThemeGravity FormsjQueryCloudflare DNS
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:53:39 PM
58
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ACME Ticketing is a specialized software provider offering advanced, versatile ticketing, membership, and donation management solutions. The company appears to target organizations requiring unified ticketing and membership management, positioning itself as a niche technology provider. The website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and integrates Gravity Forms for form handling, indicating a mature but standard technical infrastructure. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, and the domain is registered with GoDaddy since 2014, supporting the business's legitimacy and operational history. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enabled and domain locks in place, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for enhanced protection. Privacy compliance is weak due to the absence of privacy and cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and functional but would benefit from improved privacy and security practices to enhance trust and compliance.

Detected Technologies

WordPressDivi ThemeGravity FormsjQueryCloudflare DNS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the technology sector, focusing on software solutions for ticketing and membership management. Its business model likely revolves around SaaS or software licensing. The market position is that of a specialized provider catering to organizations needing integrated ticketing and donation management. The website content and structured data reflect a consistent brand identity with a clear description of services. No explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies may limit customer trust and regulatory compliance. Marketing tools like Rank Math SEO and Jetpack Stats are used, indicating some investment in digital marketing and analytics.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website employs HTTPS and has domain status protections such as clientDeleteProhibited, which are positive security indicators. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers were detected in the provided content, which could expose the site to certain attacks. There is no evidence of a security policy, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms like security.txt. Forms are present via Gravity Forms but no explicit security measures or data protection statements are visible. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with standard best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ACME Ticketing

Description:

ACME is an advanced, versatile and easy-to-use ticketing software specializing in unified ticketing, membership and donation management.

Key Services:
unified ticketingmembership managementdonation management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPressDivi ThemeGravity FormsjQueryCloudflare DNS
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Jetpack Stats
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Jetpack Stats
Marketing Tools:
Rank Math SEO
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Gravity Forms plugin.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

Complex SPF record

LOW

Too many include statements can cause lookup limits

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:stspg-customer.com ip4:50.18.223.36 ip4:72.47.233.156 ip4:167.89.24.26 a:acmeticketing.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all
DNS Lookups:6/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:google(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

42/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 53 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(188 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:192.0.78.148, 192.0.78.246
Name Servers:
doug.ns.cloudflare.com
nola.ns.cloudflare.com
MX Records:
10: aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
20: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
30: aspmx2.googlemail.com
30: aspmx3.googlemail.com
SOA:Serial: 2382164259, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:255ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:sendgrid.net include:_spf.google.com include:stspg-customer.com ip4:50.18.223.36 ip4:72.47.233.156 ip4:167.89.24.26 a:acmeticketing.com include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf.wpcloud.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a well-known CMS (WordPress) with a popular theme (Divi) and uses Gravity Forms for form management. The tech stack is standard and widely supported, which aids maintainability but may require regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential. SEO is well addressed with meta tags and structured data. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS is managed by Cloudflare, which can provide performance and security benefits. The absence of DNSSEC and security headers are technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall security and resilience.
Analyze Another Website