Skip to main content

Is acmrs.org a Scam? Security Check Results - ACMRS Press Reviews

acmrs.org favicon

Is acmrs.org Safe? Security Analysis for ACMRS Press

Check if acmrs.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EducationUnited Statessmall
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics+5 more
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 6:59:38 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

ACMRS Press is an academic publishing division affiliated with the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies at Arizona State University. It specializes in publishing scholarly works in premodern studies, emphasizing open access to break down traditional barriers in academic publishing. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting academics, researchers, and educators in medieval and renaissance studies. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and uses CDN services for content delivery. SEO and mobile optimization are well implemented, though accessibility is basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and domain locking but lacks DNSSEC and security headers. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is trustworthy and functional but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsSupadu pluginBB PluginFontAwesome 5.15.4Vimeo Player APICloudfront CDN

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business operates in a niche academic publishing market with a focus on open access, which positions it competitively among university presses and scholarly publishers. Its partnership with ASU and use of external platforms for open access catalog and sales indicate a collaborative ecosystem. The business model combines open access digital content with print sales, targeting a specialized academic audience. Growth potential lies in expanding open access offerings and enhancing author support resources. The lack of direct contact information on the homepage suggests a focus on institutional rather than direct consumer engagement.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and domain registration protections in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No incident response or security policies are published, and no dedicated security contact channels are provided. The use of third-party analytics and marketing tools introduces moderate tracking but no evident vulnerabilities. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is not clearly addressed, representing a compliance gap. Overall, the security posture is functional but could benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

ACMRS Press

Description:

ACMRS Press is the publications division of the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. They publish forward-looking, theoretically expansive, and vanguard research in premodern studies, aiming to break down traditional barriers to scholarly knowledge by making their catalog open access and supporting authors through a transparent publishing process.

Key Services:
Publishing scholarly books and journalsProviding open access to titlesSupporting authors with publishing resources
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2Yoast SEO pluginjQueryGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle AnalyticsSupadu pluginBB PluginFontAwesome 5.15.4Vimeo Player APICloudfront CDN
Frameworks:
WordPress
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
70/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
ShareThis
Marketing Tools:
ShareThis
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

25/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, YouTube

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

47/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 63 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
5 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(105 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:162.159.135.42
Name Servers:
ns45.domaincontrol.com
ns46.domaincontrol.com
SOA:Serial: 2024121700, TTL: 600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with up-to-date plugins including Yoast SEO for search optimization and Supadu for publishing management. It leverages CDN services (Cloudfront) for media delivery and integrates Google Tag Manager and Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses standard web fonts and icons (FontAwesome). Performance is moderate with some potential for optimization. The technical stack is well suited for academic publishing but could improve in security configurations and privacy compliance. No critical technical debt or vulnerabilities were detected in the HTML content.
Analyze Another Website