Skip to main content

Is adbox.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Ad Box SIA Reviews

adbox.lv favicon

Is adbox.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Ad Box SIA

Check if adbox.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

MediaLatviasmall
jQueryHighchartsGoogle Tag ManagerWordPressContact Form 7+1 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 9:29:34 PM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Ad Box SIA operates the website adbox.lv, a digital sales house specializing in internet advertising in Latvia since 2014. The company provides a technological platform for publishers and advertisers to manage and serve various ad formats including standard banners, rich media, video, and mobile ads. Positioned as a reliable and growing player in the Latvian digital advertising market, Adbox emphasizes strong partnerships, technological capabilities, and transparent billing. The website content is professional and clearly targeted at digital advertising stakeholders, with comprehensive service descriptions and contact information. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS using common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and qTranslate-XT for multilingual support. It employs modern JavaScript libraries including jQuery and Highcharts, and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site is served over HTTPS with a cookie consent mechanism implemented, indicating a baseline level of privacy compliance. Performance and mobile optimization are moderate to good, though accessibility features could be improved. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS but lacks explicit security headers and documented security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits restricts domain legitimacy verification, but the website content and business information appear consistent and trustworthy. Privacy and cookie policies are present, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the website presents a professional and credible digital advertising business with a solid technical foundation and basic privacy compliance. Enhancements in security headers, accessibility, and explicit security policies would strengthen its security posture and trustworthiness.

Detected Technologies

jQueryHighchartsGoogle Tag ManagerWordPressContact Form 7qTranslate-XT

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Ad Box SIA is positioned as a specialized digital advertising sales house in Latvia, targeting both publishers and advertisers. Its competitive advantage lies in a stable technological platform supporting diverse ad formats and a transparent billing system. The business model focuses on monetizing publisher inventory and providing tailored advertising solutions. The company demonstrates growth and stability since its 2014 founding, with a clear local market focus. The partnership ecosystem is implied but not explicitly detailed. Revenue streams likely derive from advertising sales commissions and platform services. The website content and structure support clear communication to its target segments, indicating a mature digital presence with room for further technical and security maturity.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@adbox.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3716735****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website maintains a basic but adequate security posture with HTTPS enabled and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, it lacks several security best practices such as security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), documented security policies, and incident response contacts. No signs of vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. GDPR compliance is supported by privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, suitable for the business scale but with opportunities for improvement to reduce risk and enhance user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Ad Box SIA

Description:

Adbox is a digital sales house in Latvia, established in 2014, providing digital advertising solutions including banner serving, rich media, video, and mobile ads. It offers services for publishers and advertisers with a focus on reliable partnerships, technological platform, and transparent billing.

Key Services:
Banner serving platformAdvertising solutions (standard ads, rich media, video, mobile)Technical and sales supportBilling and revenue management
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryHighchartsGoogle Tag ManagerWordPressContact Form 7qTranslate-XT
Platforms:
WordPress CMS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
75/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics
Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Adbox internal network
Tracking Pixels:
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 ip4:195.13.218.205 ip4:195.13.218.201 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 60 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:194.152.33.36
Name Servers:
meg.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
weston.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.inbox.eu
SOA:Serial: 2378424325, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:60ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 ip4:195.13.218.205 ip4:195.13.218.201 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress CMS with plugins such as Contact Form 7 and qTranslate-XT for multilingual support. It uses jQuery, Highcharts for charts, and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads asynchronously some scripts from its own subdomain (b.adbox.lv) for ad serving. The design is responsive with mobile-specific CSS. Performance is moderate with no major blocking scripts detected. SEO is basic with meta tags and hreflang for language variants. Accessibility is basic but could be improved. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small digital advertising business with opportunities for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website