Skip to main content

Is adetalas.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - SIA „CRYSTALLINE“ Reviews

adetalas.lv favicon

Is adetalas.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA „CRYSTALLINE“

Check if adetalas.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TransportationLatviasmall
jQueryjQuery UIOwl CarouselMagnific PopupGoogle Fonts (Poppins)
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 8:46:01 PM
42
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Adetalas.lv is an e-commerce website operated by SIA „CRYSTALLINE“, specializing in the sale of original and analogue automotive spare parts. The business targets car owners and automotive service providers primarily in Latvia, offering parts by part number, VIN, and brand. The website demonstrates a consistent and professional brand presence with clear contact information and legal disclosures. Technically, the site is built on the OpenCart CMS platform, utilizing common JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel to enhance user experience. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user interface with clear navigation and search functionality. Security-wise, the website enforces HTTPS but lacks several important security headers, which could be improved to enhance protection. Privacy compliance is basic, with a privacy policy and terms of service present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the site appears legitimate and functional, though the absence of WHOIS data limits full domain trust verification.

Detected Technologies

jQueryjQuery UIOwl CarouselMagnific PopupGoogle Fonts (Poppins)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the transportation and retail sectors, focusing on automotive spare parts sales. Founded in 2013, it maintains a small business profile with a regional market focus in Latvia. The business model is straightforward e-commerce retail, with multiple shopping methods (by parts, VIN, brand) to cater to diverse customer needs. The website content and structure suggest a stable market position with moderate trust indicators such as clear contact details and legal information. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content. The lack of advanced marketing or analytics tools indicates a focus on organic or direct customer engagement rather than aggressive digital marketing.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Phone Numbers (2)

673*****
254*****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website has a moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. However, the absence of key security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security effectiveness. No evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries was found in the HTML content. Forms appear to be standard without advanced security features such as CAPTCHA or multi-factor authentication. The site lacks a published security policy or incident response contact, which are important for compliance and trust. Overall, the security maturity is basic and could benefit from enhancements to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

SIA „CRYSTALLINE“

Description:

Online store offering original and analogue spare parts for any car.

Key Services:
Sale of car spare parts by part numberSale by VINSale by brandCustomer support and contact services
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryjQuery UIOwl CarouselMagnific PopupGoogle Fonts (Poppins)
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure forms with autocomplete off
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

20/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

28/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:default(1296-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

57/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 384-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

Insufficient Name Servers

MEDIUM

Domain has only 1 name server (minimum 2 recommended)

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:194.135.86.169
Name Servers:
31487.s.time4vps.cloudDNS only
MX Records:
10: mx.inbox.eu
SOA:Serial: 2025071928, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:164ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.inbox.eu ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses OpenCart CMS with a standard set of JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, jQuery UI, Owl Carousel, and Magnific Popup. Google Fonts are used for typography. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly, with a moderate performance profile. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags detected. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content. The site does not use advanced analytics or tracking tools, indicating a low level of user tracking. Overall, the technical infrastructure is adequate for a small e-commerce business but could be modernized with enhanced SEO, accessibility, and security features.
Analyze Another Website