Skip to main content

Is adform.net a Scam? Security Check Results - adform.net Reviews

A

Is adform.net Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if adform.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyN/amedium
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 7:27:56 AM
54
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The domain adform.net is registered since 2002 and appears to be associated with a technology business, likely in digital advertising or related services given the domain name. However, the website content is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content served by nginx. This prevents extraction of any meaningful business, security, or compliance information from the site itself. The domain is hosted behind Akamai CDN infrastructure, indicating a professional hosting environment. The WHOIS data shows a stable and long-registered domain with appropriate domain status flags, supporting legitimacy. Due to the blocked content, no privacy policies, contact information, or security frameworks are visible, resulting in a low AI score and limited analysis capability.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Given the domain age and registrar information, the business behind adform.net is likely established and operating in the technology sector, possibly providing advertising technology solutions. The lack of accessible content limits insights into market positioning, revenue streams, or partnerships. The domain's stable registration and use of Akamai nameservers suggest a medium to large enterprise with professional infrastructure. No direct evidence of subsidiaries or parent companies was found.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently returns a 403 Forbidden error, which may be due to access restrictions or security controls. No security headers or SSL configuration details are available from the provided data. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a minor security gap. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is published on the accessible page. The domain status flags indicate protection against unauthorized domain changes. Overall, the security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of accessible content but domain registration practices are sound.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Ensure website content is accessible to authorized users to enable transparency and trust.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content served by nginx, indicating access is blocked or restricted. No specific WAF vendor identified.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

30/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
22 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(2939 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:37.157.5.49
Name Servers:
a1-125.akam.net
a10-66.akam.net
a11-67.akam.net
a13-64.akam.net
a14-65.akam.net
a20-66.akam.net
MX Records:
10: adform-net.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2016102425, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:36ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The domain uses Akamai CDN as indicated by multiple Akamai nameservers, suggesting a robust hosting and content delivery infrastructure. The website is served by nginx but currently returns a 403 Forbidden error, indicating access restrictions or misconfiguration. No CMS or frameworks could be detected due to lack of content. No scripts, metadata, or SEO elements are present. Performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility cannot be evaluated. The technical setup appears professional but inaccessible, which is a critical operational issue.
Analyze Another Website