Skip to main content

Is adpies.com a Scam? Security Check Results - Neptune Company Reviews

adpies.com favicon

Is adpies.com Safe? Security Analysis for Neptune Company

Check if adpies.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologySouth Koreasmall
jQuery 1.11.3jQuery Easing 1.3jQuery bxSlider
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 6:28:55 PM
47
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

ADPIE is a South Korean technology company operating an SSP advertising platform that leverages advanced targeting technologies to maximize ad revenue for publishers and advertisers. The platform integrates with global ad networks and supports various ad formats including native, video, and lock screen ads. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image, targeting app publishers and advertisers seeking monetization solutions. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.11.3 and is hosted on AWS infrastructure, indicating moderate digital maturity. Mobile optimization and user experience are good, though accessibility and SEO could be improved. Security posture is moderate; HTTPS is used, but DNSSEC is not enabled and security headers are missing. The use of outdated libraries poses potential vulnerabilities. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy and terms of service available, but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR-specific indicators. Contact information is provided with a physical address and company email, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is safe with no adult or questionable content detected.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 1.11.3jQuery Easing 1.3jQuery bxSlider

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

ADPIE operates in the technology sector as an SSP platform, facilitating ad mediation and monetization for mobile app publishers. Founded in 2015 and owned by Neptune Company, it targets Korean and international markets with a focus on maximizing fill rates and eCPM through advanced RTB and mediation technologies. The business model is B2B, serving advertisers and publishers. The company maintains partnerships with various app publishers as indicated by the partner app icons. The website content and WHOIS data are consistent, supporting legitimacy. However, the absence of social media presence and limited marketing tools suggest a focused but possibly small-scale operation. The company could benefit from expanding transparency and security disclosures to strengthen trust and compliance.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@adpies.com

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a moderate security posture. HTTPS is enforced on login pages, and domain transfer protection is enabled. However, DNSSEC is not implemented, which could expose DNS spoofing risks. The use of outdated jQuery 1.11.3 introduces potential vulnerabilities. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information published. Privacy compliance is basic, lacking cookie consent mechanisms and GDPR-specific disclosures. Overall, while no critical security flaws were found, improvements are needed to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Neptune Company

Description:

고도화된 타켓팅 기술력으로 높은 수익을 얻을 수있는 SSP 광고 플랫폼 (An SSP advertising platform providing advanced targeting technology for higher revenue)

Key Services:
Ad mediationHigh fill rate and eCPMVarious ad formats including native, video, lock screen adsOnline process for registration, SDK integration, revenue confirmation and settlement
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 1.11.3jQuery Easing 1.3jQuery bxSlider
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • Domain uses HTTPS (implied by login URLs)
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized transfer

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

77/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

55/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: hybv3gg4rwrpd2j3sfy3dykvxpvagxkmfkah3auozxb27ro3xf4a.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
9 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(65 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:54.180.13.35
Name Servers:
ns-1236.awsdns-26.org
ns-1806.awsdns-33.co.uk
ns-400.awsdns-50.com
ns-520.awsdns-01.net
MX Records:
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
15: hybv3gg4rwrpd2j3sfy3dykvxpvagxkmfkah3auozxb27ro3xf4a.mx-verification.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a traditional tech stack centered on jQuery and bxSlider plugins, indicating a legacy front-end approach. Hosting is via Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure, suggesting reliable hosting. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and uses meta viewport tags. SEO is basic with meta keywords and descriptions, but lacks advanced structured data like JSON-LD. No CMS was detected, implying a custom or static site. Performance is moderate, with some potential for improvement by updating scripts and optimizing assets. Accessibility features are minimal but present. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Analyze Another Website