Skip to main content

Is adrop.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - adrop.lv Reviews

adrop.lv favicon

Is adrop.lv Safe? Security Analysis for A'Drop – Cocktail Bar

Check if adrop.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityLatviasmall
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 11:35:48 PM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website represents a small local cocktail bar named A'Drop located in Riga, Latvia. It provides basic information about its operating hours, contact details, and location. The business targets adults interested in nightlife and cocktail experiences. The site is built on WordPress using the Flynt framework and includes modern JavaScript and CSS assets. However, the content is minimal and primarily focused on basic business information without extensive marketing or engagement features. Security posture is limited with no detected security headers and unknown SSL configuration. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance and trust. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site is functional but basic, suitable for a small hospitality business.

Detected Technologies

JavaScriptCSSHTML

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

A'Drop operates in the hospitality sector as a cocktail bar serving evening clientele. The business model is straightforward, focusing on local customers in Riga. The website lacks advanced marketing tools or analytics, indicating a small-scale operation. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The absence of privacy and security policies suggests limited regulatory compliance focus. The business appears to maintain consistent branding and basic online presence but could improve digital maturity and trust signals.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@adrop.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712030****

Physical Addresses (1)

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture is minimal. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical and resource URLs), but no security headers were detected in the provided data. There are no visible forms collecting sensitive data, reducing immediate risk. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No incident response or security contact information is available. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Recommendations include implementing security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and improving incident response readiness.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Cocktail bar located in Riga, Latvia offering evening service starting at 18:00 on Wednesday, Friday, and Saturday.

Key Services:
Cocktail bar servicesEvening/night venue
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
JavaScriptCSSHTML
Frameworks:
Flynt
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

basic

Security Assessment

Security Score:
40/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a small local cocktail bar in Riga, Latvia.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

55/100
Score

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

40/100
Score

No SPF record found

HIGH

SPF helps prevent email spoofing

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 44 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:91.228.7.236
Name Servers:
glen.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
rosalie.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2377075943, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:128ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on WordPress with the Flynt theme framework, using modern JavaScript modules and CSS assets. The site loads images responsively and uses lazy loading for performance optimization. Accessibility features such as skip links are present, but overall accessibility is basic. SEO optimization is minimal with basic meta tags and canonical links. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. Performance is moderate with no evident critical errors or broken elements. The technical stack is modern but underutilized for business growth and security.
Analyze Another Website