Skip to main content

Is adtrafficquality.google a Scam? Security Check Results - Google Reviews

adtrafficquality.google favicon

Is adtrafficquality.google Safe? Security Analysis for Google

Check if adtrafficquality.google is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Statesenterprise
AngularJS 1.6.6CreateJSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle FontsCanvas animations
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 1:22:10 PM
68
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Google's 'Ad Traffic Quality' website page provides detailed information about their efforts to protect advertisers and publishers from invalid activity and advertising fraud. The site targets advertisers, agencies, publishers, app developers, and YouTube creators, emphasizing Google's leadership in digital advertising and their commitment to maintaining ad quality through advanced technology and expert teams. The technical infrastructure leverages modern web technologies including AngularJS, CreateJS, and Google Tag Manager, hosted on Google's own infrastructure, ensuring fast performance and excellent mobile optimization. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms in place, though explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosure policies are not present on this page. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with privacy regulations including GDPR.

Detected Technologies

AngularJS 1.6.6CreateJSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle FontsCanvas animations

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Google holds a dominant market position in the digital advertising sector, offering services that protect ad traffic quality and prevent fraud. Their business model revolves around providing advertising platforms and tools that maximize advertiser ROI while ensuring fair monetization for publishers. The website content reflects a mature, enterprise-level organization with a global reach. The presence of official policy links and consistent branding reinforces trust and credibility. Google’s ecosystem includes extensive partnerships and integrations, though no direct partner domains were identified on this page. The site’s content and structure support clear communication of complex advertising quality concepts to a professional audience.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level of the website is high, with HTTPS enforced and a cookie consent banner indicating privacy compliance. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a published vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file suggest areas for improvement. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. Incident response contact information is not provided, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the security posture supports business operations effectively but could benefit from additional security best practices and public disclosure mechanisms.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish explicit security headers like Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Google

Description:

Google provides advertising services focused on protecting customers from invalid activity and advertising fraud by using advanced technology and expert teams.

Key Services:
Ad traffic quality monitoringInvalid activity detection and preventionAdvertising fraud protection
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
AngularJS 1.6.6CreateJSGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle FontsCanvas animations
Frameworks:
AngularJS
Platforms:
Web
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
90/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:excellent

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
Google Ads
Transparency Level:excellent

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive animations.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

45/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Weak X-XSS-Protection configuration

LOW

Current value: "0"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

68/100
Score

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

83/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:mailauth-reports@google.com
MTA-STS Details
Mode:enforce
Max Age:1 days

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 65 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
27 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
none(1103 days)
Protection Level
strongDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:216.58.209.174
AAAA Records:2a00:1450:4026:802::200e
Name Servers:
ns1.google.com
ns2.google.com
ns3.google.com
ns4.google.com
MX Records:
10: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 802961439, TTL: 60s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:43ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses a modern and robust technology stack including AngularJS for frontend framework, CreateJS for canvas animations, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing tags. Hosting is managed by Google, ensuring high availability and performance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and good accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. No CMS was detected, indicating a custom or proprietary platform. Performance is fast with asynchronous loading of scripts and optimized assets. Technical risks are minimal but could include dependency on older AngularJS versions if not maintained.
Analyze Another Website