Skip to main content

Is advanceat.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - Advance AT Reviews

advanceat.lv favicon

Is advanceat.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Advance AT

Check if advanceat.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

ManufacturingLatviasmall
jQuery 3.7.0Skrollr.jsFontAwesomePhotoSwipe gallerySnowplow analytics
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 12:19:36 PM
60
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Advance AT is a Latvian small business specializing in the sale, installation, and servicing of grain drying and pre-processing equipment tailored to agricultural enterprises. Established in 2012, the company positions itself as a trusted provider of quality and economical grain processing solutions, representing notable partners in the industry. The website reflects a professional digital presence with clear business information, structured data, and compliance with privacy regulations. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Skrollr, and CDN hosting, ensuring moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and incident response details are absent. Overall, the site is safe, business-focused, and trustworthy with no signs of blocking or WAF interference.

Detected Technologies

jQuery 3.7.0Skrollr.jsFontAwesomePhotoSwipe gallerySnowplow analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The company operates in the manufacturing and transportation sectors, targeting Latvian agricultural businesses needing grain processing equipment. Its business model is B2B, offering equipment sales, installation, maintenance, and project design services. The presence of partner logos and structured data indicates a collaborative ecosystem. The website content and navigation are well-structured, supporting customer engagement and lead generation. The company maintains a modest but consistent brand image and provides comprehensive contact details, enhancing credibility.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@advanceat.lv

Phone Numbers (1)

+3712700****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent mechanisms, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a security.txt file limit the security maturity. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide explicit incident response contacts, which could be improved to enhance security readiness and trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to strengthen security posture.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Advance AT

Description:

Advance AT piedāvā kvalitatīvu, ekonomisku graudu pirmapstrādes kompleksu, pielāgotu saimniecības vajadzībām. Nodrošina iekārtas, uzstādīšanu un servisu graudu kaltēšanai un pirmapstrādei.

Key Services:
Graudu kaltu un torņu tirdzniecībaIekārtu uzstādīšana un servissSkiču projektu izstrādeRezerves daļasBūvniecība
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQuery 3.7.0Skrollr.jsFontAwesomePhotoSwipe gallerySnowplow analytics
Platforms:
Multiscreensite CMS platform
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsSnowplow
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:good

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Snowplow
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with rich content and structured data.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

70/100
Score

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

10/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Google Analytics

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 71 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:100.24.208.97, 35.172.94.1
Name Servers:
a.sigmanet.lvDNS only
b.sigmanet.lvDNS only
MX Records:
20: mx2.sigmanet.lv
10: mx.sigmanet.lv
SOA:Serial: 2025073101, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:161ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 include:spf.protect.sigmanet.lv -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on the Multiscreensite CMS platform, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.0 and Skrollr for animations. It uses CDN-hosted resources for fonts, images, and scripts, contributing to moderate loading performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and structured data. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. The technical stack is stable but could benefit from additional security hardening and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website