Skip to main content

Is advexplore.com a Scam? Security Check Results - advexplore.com Reviews

A

Is advexplore.com Safe? Security Analysis for advexplore.com

Check if advexplore.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/1/2025Completed 6:16:48 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website advexplore.com presents minimal content primarily consisting of embedded iframes and tracking pixels, with no visible business or contact information. The domain is registered since 2014 via PDR Ltd. without privacy protection, indicating a stable registration but lacking transparency about the business entity. The technical infrastructure appears basic with no detected CMS or modern frameworks, and the site lacks essential security and privacy policies. Security posture is weak due to absence of security headers, DNSSEC, and unclear SSL configuration. Overall, the site seems to function mainly as an advertising or tracking platform rather than a professional business website.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the lack of explicit business information, the market positioning and business model cannot be clearly determined. The domain age suggests a longstanding presence, but the absence of company details, contact information, or service descriptions limits insights into competitive advantages or revenue streams. No partnerships or subsidiaries are identified. The site likely targets general internet users for advertising purposes rather than a specific customer segment.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low, with no evidence of security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures. The domain lacks DNSSEC and security headers, and the embedded third-party iframes and tracking pixels may introduce privacy and security risks. Compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations is not demonstrated. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are absent, suggesting a need for significant improvements to reduce risk exposure.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC and implement robust DNS security measures.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:extensive
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
l.cdn-fileserver.com
Marketing Tools:
find-searcher.com
Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and primarily consists of embedded iframes and tracking pixels.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

65/100
Score

No DMARC record found

HIGH

DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a -all
DNS Lookups:1/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
MTA-STS Details

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 40 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: ~

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(267 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:199.191.50.141
Name Servers:
ns1004.ztomy.com
ns2004.ztomy.com
MX Records:
300: ~
SOA:Serial: 2011062801, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:194ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses basic HTML with embedded iframes from external domains primarily for advertising and tracking. No modern CMS or frameworks are detected. Hosting is via PDR Ltd., a common domain registrar and hosting provider. Performance is moderate but limited by external content loading. Mobile optimization and accessibility are minimal, and SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data. Technical debt is evident from the lack of security best practices and minimal content structure.
Analyze Another Website