Skip to main content

Is aeea.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Asociación Español en Andalucia Reviews

aeea.org favicon

Is aeea.org Safe? Security Analysis for Asociación Español en Andalucia

Check if aeea.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Non-profitSpainsmall
Google FontsFacebook SDKYoast SEOMonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)Ultimate Social Media Icons+6 more
Analyzed 7/31/2025Completed 4:21:08 AM
43
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Asociación Español en Andalucia operates as a regional non-profit association focused on the Spanish community in Andalucia. The website is multilingual, targeting Spanish speakers and international visitors interested in Andalucia. The site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and hosted on SiteGround, indicating a moderate level of technical infrastructure. SEO is supported by Yoast SEO, and social media integration is present via Facebook SDK. However, the site lacks explicit privacy and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing DNSSEC and security headers. Google Analytics plugin is installed but not configured, limiting analytics effectiveness. Overall, the site is functional and safe but requires improvements in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Detected Technologies

Google FontsFacebook SDKYoast SEOMonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)Ultimate Social Media IconsSiteGround hostingWordPressDivi ThemeShared Files pluginCookie Notice pluginWPML (Multilingual CMS)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The association appears to serve a niche community with a focus on cultural or social activities in Andalucia. Its business model is likely non-profit, relying on community engagement rather than commercial revenue. The multilingual support suggests an intent to reach a broader audience beyond Spain. The domain age of over 20 years supports legitimacy and stability. There is no evidence of commercial partnerships or subsidiaries. The lack of contact information and formal policies may limit growth and trust with new users. The site uses common WordPress plugins and themes, indicating standard operational practices.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

a*****@aeea.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website benefits from HTTPS encryption, which is mandatory for secure communications. However, the absence of DNSSEC leaves the domain vulnerable to DNS spoofing attacks. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to clickjacking or XSS risks. The Google Analytics plugin is present but not configured, which may indicate incomplete setup or potential data collection issues. No incident response or security policy information is available, limiting transparency and preparedness. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security policies.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Asociación Español en Andalucia

Description:

The website represents Asociación Español en Andalucia, presumably a non-profit or community association focused on Spanish culture or community in Andalucia, Spain. The site is multilingual with language alternates for Spanish, English, German, and French.

Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Google FontsFacebook SDKYoast SEOMonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)Ultimate Social Media IconsSiteGround hostingWordPressDivi ThemeShared Files pluginCookie Notice pluginWPML (Multilingual CMS)
Frameworks:
WordPressDivi
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
60/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google Analytics (MonsterInsights plugin)
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Tracking Pixels:
Facebook SDK
Marketing Tools:
MonsterInsights (Google Analytics plugin)
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is a multilingual WordPress site using Divi theme.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

65/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy85% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:_spf.google.com +ip4:35.214.183.180 include:aeea.org.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net -all
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 74 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.2TLSv1.3TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
24 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(19 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled
  • Privacy/proxy registration detected

DNS Records

A Records:35.214.230.202
Name Servers:
ns1.siteground.net
ns2.siteground.net
MX Records:
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx2.googlemail.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
10: aspmx3.googlemail.com
1: aspmx.l.google.com

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 +a +mx include:_spf.google.com +ip4:35.214.183.180 include:aeea.org.spf.auto.dnssmarthost.net -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

CRITICAL

Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a mature WordPress platform using the Divi theme, which provides flexibility and a professional design. The use of Yoast SEO and WPML plugins indicates attention to SEO and multilingual capabilities. Hosting on SiteGround is a positive indicator of reliable infrastructure. Performance is moderate with standard Google Fonts and Facebook SDK integrations. Accessibility is basic but could be improved with ARIA roles and semantic HTML enhancements. The site lacks advanced security configurations and some privacy compliance elements. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Analyze Another Website