Skip to main content

Is aevo.xyz a Scam? Security Check Results - aevo.xyz Reviews

aevo.xyz favicon

Is aevo.xyz Safe? Security Analysis for Aevo - Trade Perps, Options and Strategies

Check if aevo.xyz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

FinanceN/asmall
EVM roll-upEthereum blockchainFramer (website builder)
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 8:49:43 AM
56
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

Aevo is a decentralized finance platform specializing in high-performance trading of perpetuals, options, and strategies using a custom EVM roll-up on Ethereum. The platform targets traders interested in decentralized derivatives markets, offering an off-chain orderbook with on-chain settlements. The website is built using modern tools like Framer, presenting a professional and consistent design. However, the site lacks critical compliance and security documentation such as privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and security policies, which impacts trust and regulatory adherence. No contact information or incident response details are provided, limiting user support and transparency. The technical infrastructure appears modern but lacks visible security best practices in the website headers and metadata. Overall, Aevo presents a promising decentralized exchange offering but should improve its security posture and compliance transparency to enhance trust and user confidence.

Detected Technologies

EVM roll-upEthereum blockchainFramer (website builder)

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Aevo positions itself as an innovator in the decentralized derivatives trading space, leveraging Ethereum and custom roll-up technology to offer advanced trading products. Its business model revolves around providing a decentralized exchange platform with off-chain orderbooks and on-chain settlements, targeting sophisticated traders in the DeFi ecosystem. The lack of publicly available company information and contact details suggests a small or early-stage operation typical in crypto startups. No partnerships or certifications are evident from the website content. The platform's focus on options and perpetuals trading differentiates it in the DeFi market, but growth and adoption will depend on establishing trust through transparency and compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level with no detected security headers, no published security or incident response policies, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. While the platform operates on blockchain technology, the website itself does not demonstrate adherence to web security best practices, which could expose users to risks. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, which reduces privacy concerns but also limits insight into user behavior. To improve security posture, Aevo should implement HTTPS enforcement, security headers, publish a security policy, and provide clear contact channels for incident reporting.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR-compliant consent mechanisms.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

Aevo is the world's first high-performance decentralized exchange focussed on options and perps trading. The exchange runs on a custom EVM roll-up that rolls up to Ethereum. Aevo operates an off-chain orderbook with on-chain settlements.

Key Services:
decentralized exchangeoptions tradingperpetuals tradingoff-chain orderbookon-chain settlements
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
EVM roll-upEthereum blockchainFramer (website builder)
Frameworks:
Framer
Platforms:
Ethereum
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:moderate

Key Observations

1

Website is built using Framer, indicating modern design tools.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 31 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

Unregistered MX Record

HIGH

MX record points to unregistered domain: kdtsc6wuimafeub4on2aln3xuqoasahodz6noxaaocawlmtkivcq.mx-verification.google.com

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
3 years(established)
Expiry Risk
medium(73 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:52.223.52.2, 35.71.142.77
Name Servers:
ns-1238.awsdns-26.org
ns-1604.awsdns-08.co.uk
ns-316.awsdns-39.com
ns-605.awsdns-11.net
MX Records:
1: aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt3.aspmx.l.google.com
10: alt4.aspmx.l.google.com
15: kdtsc6wuimafeub4on2aln3xuqoasahodz6noxaaocawlmtkivcq.mx-verification.google.com
5: alt1.aspmx.l.google.com
5: alt2.aspmx.l.google.com
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:146ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website uses Framer as its CMS and design framework, indicating a modern and visually appealing front-end. The technical stack includes a custom EVM roll-up on Ethereum for the core business functionality, which is advanced blockchain technology. However, the website lacks visible performance optimization indicators and accessibility features appear basic. SEO metadata is present and well-structured, including Open Graph and Twitter card tags. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are not explicitly available from the provided data. The absence of security headers and compliance documentation suggests technical debt in security and privacy implementation. Overall, the technical foundation is solid for business operations but requires improvements in web security and compliance to reduce operational risks.
Analyze Another Website