Skip to main content

Is afac.com.au a Scam? Security Check Results - Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC) Reviews

afac.com.au favicon

Is afac.com.au Safe? Security Analysis for Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC)

Check if afac.com.au is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

GovernmentAustraliamedium
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics
Analyzed 9/7/2025Completed 1:03:08 PM
62
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

AFAC (Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council) is a key national organization supporting fire and emergency services across Australia and New Zealand. It operates as a member-based non-profit entity focused on enhancing emergency management capabilities through collaboration, training, knowledge sharing, and national coordination. The organization holds a strong market position as a leader in emergency management, providing critical services such as the National Resource Sharing Centre, National Aerial Firefighting Centre, and the Australian Institute for Disaster Resilience. The website reflects a professional and authoritative presence with clear messaging targeted at emergency management professionals and organizations. Technically, the website is built on modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on Azure, and integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking. The site is well-optimized for performance, mobile responsiveness, and accessibility, demonstrating a mature digital infrastructure. However, there is room for improvement in security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms such as cookie consent. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and shows no signs of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries. The absence of explicit security policies or incident response contacts is a gap that could be addressed to enhance trust and readiness. The domain registration details align well with the organization's profile, supporting legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, AFAC's website is a high-quality, professional platform that effectively serves its target audience. Strategic improvements in privacy compliance and security policy transparency would further strengthen its security posture and regulatory alignment.

Detected Technologies

ReactNext.jsJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AFAC operates in the government and non-profit sectors, focusing on emergency management coordination and capability building in Australia and New Zealand. Its business model centers on member services, national coordination, and knowledge dissemination. The organization leverages partnerships with specialized entities such as NAFC, AIDR, and EMPS to extend its service offerings. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, government funding, and event sponsorships. The target customer segments are emergency service agencies, government bodies, and professionals in the emergency management sector. Growth indicators include ongoing major projects, national initiatives, and a prominent annual conference. The partnership ecosystem is robust, linking multiple specialized organizations to provide comprehensive emergency management solutions.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

AFAC demonstrates a solid security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible exposure of sensitive data. The use of reputable hosting and modern frameworks reduces risk. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published incident response or security policies are notable gaps. No vulnerability disclosures or security certifications are evident on the site. The site does not provide direct security contact channels, which could hinder incident reporting and response. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with opportunities for enhancement in transparency and technical controls.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement and publish a formal security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council (AFAC)

Description:

AFAC is the National Council for fire and emergency services in Australia and New Zealand, creating synergies across the emergency management sector. It is an independent, member-based organisation supporting connected and capable emergency management in Australia and New Zealand.

Key Services:
National Resource Sharing CentreNational Aerial Firefighting CentreAustralian Institute for Disaster ResilienceEmergency Management Professionalisation SchemeAFAC Conference and ExhibitionTraining and developmentDoctrine publicationsCollaboration facilitation
Content Quality:

excellent

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
ReactNext.jsJavaScriptGoogle Tag ManagerGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Next.js
Performance:

fast

Mobile:

excellent

Accessibility:

good

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
80/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:excellent
User Experience:excellent
Content Relevance:excellent
Navigation Clarity:excellent
Professionalism:excellent
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

40/100
Score

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

10/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: energy, transport, banking, health, digital

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:EventsAirmail.com ip4:4.198.89.125 ip4:68.218.11.140 ip4:52.158.152.246 ip4:52.63.40.1 ip4:20.92.83.6 ip4:103.12.11.0/24 ip4:216.218.133.192/26 ip4:209.51.184.0/26 ip4:216.52.207.64/26 ip4:95.172.88.0/27 ip4:199.168.148.0/23 include:sp f.protection.outlook.com ~all
DNS Lookups:4/10
Policy:~all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:k2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:selector1(1296-bit rsa)
Selector:selector2(1416-bit rsa)
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:AFAC.Admin@afacau.onmicrosoft.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

1 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

Domain Registration Details

Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:52.158.130.208
Name Servers:
ns1.melbourneit.net
ns2.melbourneit.net
ns3.melbourneit.net
ns4.melbourneit.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: afac-com-au.mail.protection.outlook.com
SOA:Serial: 2025082001, TTL: 172800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:69ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:EventsAirmail.com ip4:4.198.89.125 ip4:68.218.11.140 ip4:52.158.152.246 ip4:52.63.40.1 ip4:20.92.83.6 ip4:103.12.11.0/24 ip4:216.218.133.192/26 ip4:209.51.184.0/26 ip4:216.52.207.64/26 ip4:95.172.88.0/27 ip4:199.168.148.0/23 include:sp f.protection.outlook.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built using Next.js, a modern React framework, indicating a contemporary and scalable architecture. Hosting on Azure provides reliable infrastructure and global availability. The site uses optimized images and lazy loading for performance. Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics are integrated for analytics and marketing insights. The site is mobile responsive and accessible, with semantic HTML and ARIA attributes. No CMS is explicitly identified, but asset URLs suggest use of Directus as a headless CMS. The technical implementation is robust with good performance and SEO practices, though security headers and privacy mechanisms could be improved.
Analyze Another Website