Is afognak.com Safe? Security Analysis for Afognak Native Corporation
Check if afognak.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Afognak Native Corporation is an established Alaska Native Corporation formed under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act in 1971, serving over 1,000 shareholders. The corporation focuses on providing social, cultural, and economic benefits to its shareholders through sustainable business operations and land management. The website reflects a professional corporate presence with clear mission statements, values, and shareholder resources. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins and themes, offering moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and domain registration protections, but lacks advanced DNS security and security headers. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages. Overall, the site is trustworthy and serves its community effectively, though improvements in security and compliance documentation are recommended.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
Afognak Native Corporation occupies a niche market as a Native Corporation with a defined shareholder base, leveraging cultural heritage and land assets. Its business model centers on sustainable growth and shareholder benefits, supported by a medium-sized organizational structure. The corporation's digital presence is focused on transparency and community engagement, with clear navigation and corporate information. The absence of social media links and limited contact details suggest a controlled communication strategy. The corporation's long domain age and consistent WHOIS data reinforce its legitimacy. There is opportunity to enhance digital marketing and security posture to strengthen stakeholder trust and compliance.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS and domain transfer protections. However, the lack of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduces resilience against DNS spoofing and clickjacking attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could hinder timely security issue management. The use of WordPress necessitates regular updates to mitigate plugin vulnerabilities. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but can be improved by adopting recommended best practices and publishing security policies.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Afognak Native Corporation
Afognak Native Corporation (ANC) is an Alaska Native Corporation formed under the 1971 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and through the 1977 merger of two Alaska Native village corporations. It serves over 1,000 shareholders, providing social, cultural, and economic benefits by building a sustainable, growing enterprise.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enabled
- ClientTransferProhibited domain status
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is a WordPress-based corporate site for Afognak Native Corporation.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
SPF Details
DKIM Selectors Found
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 45 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings