Skip to main content

Is agh.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - agh.lv Reviews

A

Is agh.lv Safe? Security Analysis for AGH

Check if agh.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

Othersmall
HTML5CSS
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 10:08:40 PM
36
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website 'agh.lv' appears to represent a small business focused on providing medical, laboratory, and ergonomic school furniture. The site content is minimal, consisting mainly of two image links directing users to product categories. There is no metadata, structured data, or contact information available, which limits the ability to fully assess the business profile or market position. The target audience likely includes institutions or businesses seeking specialized furniture solutions. Technically, the website uses basic HTML and CSS without any detected CMS or advanced frameworks. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, and SEO features are minimal. Security posture is weak due to the absence of HTTPS, security headers, and privacy policies. No WHOIS data could be retrieved due to query limits, resulting in low confidence in domain legitimacy and registration details. Overall, the site is accessible but lacks critical security and compliance features, reducing trustworthiness and professional appearance.

Detected Technologies

HTML5CSS

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business appears to operate in the niche market of specialized furniture for medical and educational sectors. The business model seems to be e-commerce or informational, directing visitors to product categories. There is no evidence of partnerships, certifications, or extensive market presence. The lack of contact information and policies suggests a small or early-stage operation with limited digital maturity. Growth potential may be constrained by minimal online presence and lack of trust signals. No revenue streams or detailed business insights are available from the site content.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security maturity level is low. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. No privacy or cookie policies indicate non-compliance with GDPR or other data protection regulations. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. The site does not collect user data via forms, reducing some risk but also limiting engagement. Overall, the security posture requires significant improvement to meet basic standards and build user trust.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure user connections.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Description:

The website appears to be related to furniture, specifically medical and laboratory furniture and ergonomic school furniture, as indicated by image alt texts and linked pages.

Key Services:
Medical and laboratory furnitureErgonomic furniture for schools
Content Quality:

basic

Branding:

moderate

Technical Stack

Technologies:
HTML5CSS
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

basic

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

Security Score:
30/100

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:basic
User Experience:basic
Content Relevance:basic
Navigation Clarity:basic
Professionalism:basic
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is minimal and primarily visual with two main links to furniture categories.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

15/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

55/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No DMARC reporting

LOW

DMARC aggregate reports not configured

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:178.16.26.157 include:_spf.graftik.com ~all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:~all
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Subdomain Policy:none

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 69 days

Mixed Content Detected

MEDIUM

2 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:159.148.57.35
Name Servers:
mallory.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
yew.ns.cloudflare.comDNS only
MX Records:
10: www341.your-server.de
SOA:Serial: 2378756408, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:88ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx ip4:178.16.26.157 include:_spf.graftik.com ~all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built with simple HTML and CSS, lacking modern frameworks or CMS platforms. No JavaScript libraries or analytics tools are detected, indicating minimal technical complexity. The site includes a background video element and two linked images with alt text, but no metadata or structured data for SEO. Mobile responsiveness is basic, and accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and SSL configuration details are unavailable. Performance is likely moderate given the simple content but could be improved with optimization. The technical debt is low but modernization opportunities exist to enhance user experience and security.
Analyze Another Website