Skip to main content

Is agromonitoring.com a Scam? Security Check Results - AgroMonitoring Reviews

agromonitoring.com favicon

Is agromonitoring.com Safe? Security Analysis for AgroMonitoring

Check if agromonitoring.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

TechnologyUnited Kingdomsmall
jQueryPopper.jsBootstrapChart.jsMoment.js+1 more
Analyzed 9/5/2025Completed 5:59:05 PM
51
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

AgroMonitoring is a UK-based technology company specializing in providing satellite imagery, vegetation indices, and weather data tailored for precision farming and crop monitoring. Their offerings include an API, dashboard, crop map, and customizable analytics reports, targeting agricultural businesses and developers. The company has been operational since 2014 and maintains a professional web presence with consistent branding and clear service descriptions. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Chart.js, hosted on AWS infrastructure, and integrates Google Analytics for user tracking. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are recommended for improvement. Privacy compliance is basic with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-structured, and serves its niche market effectively.

Detected Technologies

jQueryPopper.jsBootstrapChart.jsMoment.jsGoogle Analytics

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

AgroMonitoring occupies a niche market in agricultural technology, leveraging satellite and weather data to provide precision farming tools. Their business model is subscription and API-based, appealing to agronomists, farmers, and developers needing reliable data feeds. The company demonstrates stable market positioning with a mature domain and transparent registration. Partnerships with openagro.uk and openweathermap.org suggest a collaborative ecosystem enhancing their data and analytics capabilities. The absence of phone contact and limited social media presence indicates a focus on digital and API-driven customer engagement. The company’s growth potential lies in expanding analytics services and enhancing data customization for clients.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

i*****@openweathermap.org

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website enforces HTTPS and has domain transfer protection, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are published, which could impact trust from security-conscious clients. The use of third-party analytics introduces moderate user tracking, but no cookie consent mechanism is present, which may raise privacy compliance concerns under GDPR. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in DNS security, header implementation, and privacy transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve domain security.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

AgroMonitoring

Description:

Based on a large amount of processing satellite and climate data, AgroMonitoring provides satellite imagery, vegetation indices, weather data, analytical reports, and crop monitoring services.

Key Services:
Agro API with satellite imagery and weather dataAgro Dashboard for field monitoringCrop Map with recognized field boundaries and crop typesCustomizable Agro Analytics reports
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
jQueryPopper.jsBootstrapChart.jsMoment.jsGoogle Analytics
Frameworks:
Bootstrap 4Black Design System
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
65/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics & Tracking

Services:
Google AnalyticsGoogle Tag Manager
Tracking Level:moderate
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

53/100
Score

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

No Data Protection Officer mentioned

LOW

Large organizations may need to designate a DPO under GDPR

Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

MEDIUM

Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy85% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 35 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

70/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
11 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
low(168 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:148.251.136.139
Name Servers:
ns-1335.awsdns-38.org
ns-1890.awsdns-44.co.uk
ns-244.awsdns-30.com
ns-864.awsdns-44.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:44ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

40/100
Score

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 4, jQuery, Chart.js, and Moment.js, providing a responsive and interactive user experience. Hosting on AWS DNS infrastructure suggests reliable uptime and scalability. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and mobile optimization is good. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and structured navigation. However, the site lacks a known CMS, indicating a custom or bespoke solution which may require dedicated maintenance. Accessibility features are basic and could be enhanced to meet higher standards. Overall, the technical implementation supports the business goals but could benefit from improved security and privacy features.
Analyze Another Website