Is agrostav-pce.cz Safe? Security Analysis for Agrostav Pardubice a.s.
Check if agrostav-pce.cz is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
Agrostav Pardubice a.s. is a well-established general contractor in the construction sector in the Czech Republic, with a history dating back to 1971. The company operates as part of the B.A.S. – CZ group, providing a range of construction services including engineering, building, water management, and concrete production. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting construction clients and partners in the region. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, with standard web technologies and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and formal security policies. Privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible privacy or cookie policies or consent mechanisms. Contact information is clearly provided, supporting business credibility. Overall, the website is functional, professional, and trustworthy but could improve in privacy and security transparency.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company holds a significant position in the regional construction market, supported by its long history and affiliation with the B.A.S. – CZ group. Its business model focuses on general contracting and specialized construction services, serving a diverse client base in infrastructure and building projects. The website content and references indicate a stable business with a focus on quality and experience. The lack of visible analytics or tracking suggests a privacy-conscious or minimalistic digital marketing approach. Partnerships with design studios and subsidiaries indicate a structured corporate ecosystem.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security measure. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others that help mitigate common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible incident response or security policy information, which could be a gap in transparency and readiness. No forms or input fields are present on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface, but the absence of cookie consent and privacy policies indicates potential GDPR compliance issues. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better headers, policies, and disclosures.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
Agrostav Pardubice a.s.
Agrostav Pardubice a.s. is a general contractor in construction with a tradition since 1971. It operates in engineering constructions, building constructions, water management constructions, and construction services. It is part of the B.A.S. – CZ group, which includes B.A.S. – CZ s.r.o. and B.A.S. – CONCRETE s.r.o., making it a significant market player in the Czech Republic.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
No Cookie Consent Banner found
HIGHGDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: YouTube, Google APIs
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: energy, transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 85 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
No DMARC Record
MEDIUMDMARC policy not configured
Domain Registration Details
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings