Skip to main content

Is agrowoltaika.org a Scam? Security Check Results - Polskie Stowarzyszenie Agrowoltaiki Reviews

agrowoltaika.org favicon

Is agrowoltaika.org Safe? Security Analysis for Polskie Stowarzyszenie Agrowoltaiki

Check if agrowoltaika.org is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

EnergyPolandsmall
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Smart Slider 3Bootstrap for Contact Form 7Contact Form 7+1 more
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 3:54:47 PM
46
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

Polskie Stowarzyszenie Agrowoltaiki is a Polish non-profit organization dedicated to promoting the integration of agricultural production with solar energy generation, known as agrowoltaika. The association focuses on environmental protection, sustainable agriculture, and the development of regulatory frameworks to support this emerging sector in Poland. Their website provides educational resources, news updates, reports, and contact channels to engage stakeholders and the public. The organization positions itself as a key advocate for agrowoltaika within Poland, aligning with broader European and global renewable energy trends. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing modern plugins such as Smart Slider 3, Contact Form 7 with Bootstrap styling, and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. The site is mobile-optimized, has good SEO practices, and loads with moderate performance. However, some security best practices like HTTP security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are missing, which could be improved to enhance compliance and protection. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses reCAPTCHA to mitigate spam and abuse on forms. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain registration legitimacy, but the active and professional nature of the site supports its credibility. Overall, the security posture is solid but could benefit from additional headers and privacy compliance enhancements. The overall risk assessment is low, with recommendations to implement cookie consent for GDPR compliance, add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS, and maintain regular updates of WordPress components. These steps will strengthen trust and security culture while ensuring regulatory adherence.

Detected Technologies

WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Smart Slider 3Bootstrap for Contact Form 7Contact Form 7Google reCAPTCHA v3

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The organization operates in the renewable energy and agricultural sectors, focusing on agrowoltaika, a niche but growing market segment. Its business model is non-profit, emphasizing advocacy, education, and regulatory support rather than commercial sales. The association targets agricultural producers, renewable energy developers, policymakers, and environmental stakeholders in Poland. It leverages partnerships and media presence to amplify its message. The publication of reports and hosting of conferences indicate active engagement and thought leadership. The website's clear contact information and social media links support stakeholder communication. Growth indicators include recent news updates and expanding membership. The lack of WHOIS transparency is a minor concern but does not detract significantly from operational legitimacy.

Extracted Contact Information

Marketing Intelligence Data

Email Addresses (1)

b*****@agrowoltaika.org

Phone Numbers (1)

+4850301****

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with mandatory HTTPS and the use of Google reCAPTCHA v3 to protect forms from automated abuse. No sensitive data leakage or vulnerable libraries were identified in the provided content. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and HSTS reduces the overall security hardening. There is no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could be improved to enhance transparency and readiness. Privacy compliance is partial, with a privacy policy present but no cookie consent mechanism detected. Overall, the security culture appears adequate for a non-profit organization but would benefit from implementing recommended headers and formalizing incident response procedures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to improve security hardening.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Business Insights

Company:

Polskie Stowarzyszenie Agrowoltaiki

Description:

Polskie Stowarzyszenie Agrowoltaiki działa na rzecz ochrony środowiska i rozwoju polskiego rolnictwa poprzez edukację i wspieranie rozwoju agrowoltaiki w Polsce. Promuje łączenie produkcji rolnej z wytwarzaniem energii słonecznej.

Key Services:
Educational activities (conferences, workshops, campaigns)Regulatory advocacyInformation exchange and cooperation facilitationPublication of reports
Content Quality:

good

Branding:

consistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
WordPress 6.8.2jQuery 3.7.1Smart Slider 3Bootstrap for Contact Form 7Contact Form 7Google reCAPTCHA v3
Frameworks:
Bootstrap
Platforms:
WordPress
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

good

Accessibility:

basic

SEO:

good

Security Assessment

Security Score:
85/100
Best Practices:
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA v3 implemented on forms
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:basic

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:good
User Experience:good
Content Relevance:good
Navigation Clarity:good
Professionalism:good
Trustworthiness:high

Key Observations

1

Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

35/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn, Cloudflare

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.zenbox.pl -all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:quarantine
Aggregate Reports:admin@agrowoltaika.org
Forensic Reports:admin@agrowoltaika.org

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 86 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

80/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
1 years(established)
Expiry Risk
low(80 days)
Protection Level
basicDNSSEC OFF

DNS Records

A Records:2.57.138.166
Name Servers:
ns1.zenbox.pl
ns2.zenbox.pl
MX Records:
30: mx3.zenbox.pl
20: mx2.zenbox.pl
10: mx1.zenbox.pl
SOA:Serial: 2024102800, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:68ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.zenbox.pl -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

0/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

CRITICAL

Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is built on a modern WordPress platform (version 6.8.2) with a well-structured theme and use of popular plugins such as Smart Slider 3 and Contact Form 7. It employs Bootstrap for responsive design and Google reCAPTCHA v3 for form security. The site loads external resources from trusted CDNs like cdnjs.cloudflare.com and Google domains, ensuring performance and reliability. The HTML content is well-formed with appropriate meta tags and SEO optimizations. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility is basic but present. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by slider and external scripts. No major technical debt or deprecated technologies were detected. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's goals effectively with room for security and privacy enhancements.
Analyze Another Website