Skip to main content

Is aheadmedia.lv a Scam? Security Check Results - aheadmedia.lv Reviews

A

Is aheadmedia.lv Safe? Security Analysis for Google Ads Reklāma | Ahead Media

Check if aheadmedia.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Wixcore-jsfocus-within-polyfill
Analyzed 7/30/2025Completed 9:29:48 PM
53
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.aheadmedia.lv appears to be a business site built on the Wix platform, likely related to media or advertising services. However, due to incomplete and truncated content, a full understanding of the business operations, market position, and services is not possible. The technical infrastructure relies on Wix's hosting and common polyfills, but performance and SEO optimization details are unavailable. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of visible security headers and SSL configuration details. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and WHOIS data limits trust and compliance evaluation. Overall, the site shows signs of basic setup but lacks critical transparency and security features.

Detected Technologies

Wixcore-jsfocus-within-polyfill

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

The business behind aheadmedia.lv is not clearly identifiable from the accessible content. No company name, registration details, or contact information is present. The site uses Wix, indicating a small to medium-sized business or individual operator. Advertising scripts from PageBooster suggest some marketing activity. The lack of detailed business information and external partnerships limits insights into market positioning or revenue streams.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

Security maturity appears low due to missing security headers, no visible HTTPS enforcement details, and absence of incident response or security policies. The WHOIS lookup failure due to query limits prevents verification of domain legitimacy and registrant details. No vulnerability disclosures or data protection officer information is found. The site should improve transparency and implement standard security best practices.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Enable WHOIS access or use alternative WHOIS services to obtain domain registration details for trust verification.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

None Detected

WHOIS lookup failed due to daily request limit; HTML content is truncated and incomplete, indicating partial content access or blocking.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Technical Stack

Technologies:
Wixcore-jsfocus-within-polyfill
Platforms:
Wix.com

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Ad Networks:
PageBooster
Marketing Tools:
PageBooster
Transparency Level:basic

Website Quality Assessment

Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

35/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=86400"

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

Third-party services without privacy policy

HIGH

Detected services: Facebook, LinkedIn

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
emailphone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

25/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

75/100
Score

DMARC not enforcing

MEDIUM

DMARC policy is set to "none"

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com ?all
DNS Lookups:3/10
Policy:?all
DKIM Selectors Found
Selector:s1(1440-bit rsa)
DMARC Details
Policy:none
Aggregate Reports:dmarc_agg@vali.email

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 33 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

65/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

Weak SPF Policy

HIGH

SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

DMARC Policy Set to None

LOW

DMARC is configured but not enforcing any policy

DNS Records

A Records:185.230.63.186, 185.230.63.171, 185.230.63.107
Name Servers:
ns10.wixdns.netDNS only
ns11.wixdns.netDNS only
MX Records:
1: smtp.google.com
SOA:Serial: 2023061515, TTL: 3600s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:81ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 a mx include:_spf.mlsend.com ?all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The site is built on Wix, using standard polyfills and Wix's Thunderbolt framework. External resources are loaded from Wix's CDN and PageBooster for advertising. The site lacks visible SEO metadata beyond basic viewport and charset tags. Performance and accessibility cannot be fully assessed due to incomplete content. No custom frameworks or advanced technologies detected. The site would benefit from improved SEO metadata, accessibility features, and performance optimizations.
Analyze Another Website