Skip to main content

Is ahhcxd168.com a Scam? Security Check Results - ahhcxd168.com Reviews

A

Is ahhcxd168.com Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if ahhcxd168.com is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
nginx 1.24.0
Analyzed 8/3/2025Completed 7:39:21 PM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website at ahhcxd168.com is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page served by nginx 1.24.0. No business content, metadata, or contact information is available for analysis. The domain is registered with Gname.com Pte. Ltd. since 2016 with a valid expiry in 2026, indicating a stable registration but no visible operational website. The lack of accessible content and security headers prevents a thorough evaluation of the site's technical maturity or security posture. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no contact or social media information is found, limiting trust and credibility assessment. Overall, the site appears non-operational or intentionally restricted, resulting in a low AI score and high risk for users or partners.

Detected Technologies

nginx 1.24.0

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible website content, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a potentially established entity, but no information on market positioning, services, or partnerships is available. The lack of contact details and policies further obscures any business model or operational insights.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to blocked content and lack of security headers or HTTPS information. The presence of a 403 Forbidden error indicates some access control but no evidence of modern security best practices such as CSP or HSTS. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, and no security certifications are found. The site is at risk of being flagged as untrustworthy due to minimal visible security measures.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Restore website accessibility or provide a user-friendly error page with contact information.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content served by nginx 1.24.0, indicating access is blocked or restricted.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Technologies:
nginx 1.24.0
Performance:

moderate

Mobile:

poor

Accessibility:

poor

SEO:

poor

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

50/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

52/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 43 days

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

85/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

DNS Records

A Records:156.251.42.218
Name Servers:
ns1.alidns.comDNS only
ns2.alidns.comDNS only

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is served by nginx 1.24.0 but returns a 403 Forbidden error with minimal HTML content, indicating restricted access or misconfiguration. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics scripts are detected. The absence of metadata and SEO elements suggests poor technical implementation. Mobile optimization and accessibility cannot be evaluated due to lack of content. Hosting provider details beyond the registrar are not available. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears minimal and underdeveloped.
Analyze Another Website