Skip to main content

Is ai8.net a Scam? Security Check Results - ai8.net Reviews

A

Is ai8.net Safe? Security Analysis for 403 Forbidden

Check if ai8.net is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/asmall
Analyzed 8/4/2025Completed 11:28:40 AM
38
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website ai8.net is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page which blocks access to any meaningful content. Due to this restriction, no business information, metadata, or technical details about the site’s offerings or infrastructure can be extracted. The lack of accessible content severely limits the ability to assess the company’s market position, services, or compliance posture. Technically, the site is hosted on an Apache server, but no further technology stack or CMS details are available. Security posture cannot be evaluated beyond the observation that access is restricted, which may indicate intentional blocking or misconfiguration. Overall, the site’s digital maturity appears low given the lack of public content and transparency. The domain WHOIS data is privacy protected, further limiting trust and legitimacy assessments. Strategic recommendations include resolving access issues, publishing essential compliance and contact information, and implementing security best practices to improve trust and usability.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible website content and privacy-protected WHOIS data, no concrete business intelligence can be derived. The domain appears to be either new, inactive, or restricted. No information about market positioning, business model, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The lack of public-facing information suggests the business is either in early stages or not actively maintaining the website.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the lack of accessible content and security headers data. The 403 Forbidden response indicates some level of access control, but it is unclear if this is due to a security policy, misconfiguration, or a WAF. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures are published. The absence of HTTPS confirmation and security headers is a concern. Overall, the security maturity appears low with significant gaps in transparency and compliance.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the 403 Forbidden access issue to allow public access to website content.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or restricted. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Branding:

inconsistent

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Tracking Level:minimal
Privacy Compliance:poor

Advertising & Marketing

Transparency Level:poor

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to 403 Forbidden error.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

40/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

Insufficient contact information

MEDIUM

GDPR requires organizations to provide clear contact details

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

2/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

Critical sector without clear security compliance

HIGH

Detected sectors: transport

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

60/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

No email authentication configured

CRITICAL

Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

72/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

OCSP Stapling Not Enabled

LOW

OCSP stapling improves performance and privacy

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

MEDIUM

SSL certificate expires in 85 days

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Disabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

CAA Records Not Configured

LOW

Certificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found

No DMARC Record

MEDIUM

DMARC policy not configured

DNS Records

A Records:47.94.88.149
Name Servers:
ns1.ename.netDNS only
ns2.ename.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1751342739, TTL: 1800s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:356ms

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

20/100
Score

High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

HIGH

Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

Service Exposed: SSH

MEDIUM

Port 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The website is hosted on an Apache server with HTTPS on port 443, but no further technical details are available due to the 403 Forbidden error blocking content access. No metadata, scripts, or CMS indicators are present in the HTML. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be evaluated. The lack of accessible content and technical metadata suggests either a misconfiguration or intentional restriction. Modernization opportunities include enabling proper access, adding SEO and accessibility features, and adopting a modern tech stack.
Analyze Another Website