Is aimax.lv Safe? Security Analysis for SIA AIMAX DISPLAY
Check if aimax.lv is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.
AI Summary
AIMAX DISPLAY is a Latvian small manufacturing company specializing in cardboard and plastic advertising and marketing materials with over 15 years of experience. Their product portfolio includes cardboard stands, packaging, premium boxes, and related services such as graphic design, digital and offset printing, cutting, and gluing. The company targets businesses requiring custom packaging and advertising solutions primarily in Latvia and Europe. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with multilingual support and modern front-end technologies. It includes SEO best practices and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and basic privacy compliance, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, limiting full trust verification. Contact information is clearly provided with company domain email, phone, and physical address. Overall, the website reflects a legitimate, established small business with moderate digital maturity and good business credibility.
Detected Technologies
🧠AI Business Intelligence
Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.
Business Intelligence
Market & Strategic Analysis
The company operates in the manufacturing sector focusing on custom cardboard and plastic advertising materials. Their market position is that of an experienced local manufacturer with a 15-year track record, supported by EU regional development funding. Their business model revolves around manufacturing and delivering tailored packaging and display solutions, supported by in-house design and project management. The target customers are businesses needing promotional and packaging materials. The website's multilingual support and sample delivery across Europe indicate ambitions beyond local markets. The partnership with Premium Solutions Latvia (ps.lv) suggests collaboration with digital service providers. The company shows consistent branding and trust signals such as physical address and contact details, but lacks visible certifications or security accreditations.
Extracted Contact Information
Marketing Intelligence Data
Email Addresses (1)
Phone Numbers (1)
Physical Addresses (1)
Security Posture Analysis
Comprehensive Security Assessment
The website employs HTTPS with valid SSL, uses Google Tag Manager and Analytics scripts loaded asynchronously, and implements a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness. However, it lacks important security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which could mitigate common web attacks. There is no visible security policy, incident response information, or vulnerability disclosure program. WHOIS data is unavailable, which limits domain trust verification. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, explicit policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.
Strategic Recommendations
Priority Actions for Security Improvement
Implement security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
✨Observations
AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.
AI-Enhanced Website Analysis
Business Insights
SIA AIMAX DISPLAY
Mums ir 15 gadu. Visu šo laiku mēs izgatavojam dažādus kartona izstrādājumus. Jo ilgāk mēs to darām, jo vairāk mums patīk to darīt.
good
consistent
Technical Stack
moderate
good
basic
good
Security Assessment
- HTTPS enforced
- Google Tag Manager and Analytics scripts loaded asynchronously
- Cookie consent banner implemented
Analytics & Tracking
Advertising & Marketing
Website Quality Assessment
Key Observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
🛡️Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.
Security Headers
HTTP security headers analysis
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
HIGHForces HTTPS connections
Missing X-Frame-Options header
HIGHPrevents clickjacking attacks
Missing X-Content-Type-Options header
MEDIUMPrevents MIME type sniffing
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
HIGHControls resources the browser is allowed to load
Missing X-XSS-Protection header
MEDIUMLegacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)
Missing Referrer-Policy header
LOWControls referrer information sent with requests
Missing Permissions-Policy header
MEDIUMControls browser features and APIs
Sensitive data may be cached
LOWCache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages
👤GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.
GDPR Compliance
Privacy and data protection assessment
No Privacy Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
No Cookie Policy found
HIGHGDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
EU business without adequate privacy measures
CRITICALEU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
Third-party services without privacy policy
HIGHDetected services: Google Analytics
GDPR Compliance Analysis
🛡️NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.
NIS2 Compliance
Network & Information Security Directive
No information security framework found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures
No vulnerability disclosure policy
MEDIUMNIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure
No security policy documentation found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management
No incident response procedures found
HIGHNIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans
No business continuity planning found
MEDIUMNIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity
No security contact information
HIGHNIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels
No vulnerability reporting mechanism
MEDIUMClear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure
No NIS2 reference found
LOWConsider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts
Critical sector without clear security compliance
HIGHDetected sectors: transport, digital
📧Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.
Email Security
SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation
No DMARC reporting
LOWDMARC aggregate reports not configured
No DKIM record found
MEDIUMDKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails
No BIMI Record
LOWBIMI displays brand logos in email clients
No MTA-STS Policy
MEDIUMMTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery
No TLS-RPT Record
LOWTLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues
SPF Details
DMARC Details
🏆SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis.
SSL/TLS Security
Certificate validity and encryption analysis
Weak Protocols Supported
HIGHServer supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
OCSP Stapling Not Enabled
LOWOCSP stapling improves performance and privacy
Certificate Transparency Not Implemented
LOWCertificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs
SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days
MEDIUMSSL certificate expires in 57 days
Partial SSL/TLS Assessment
LOWCompleted 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints
Protocol Support
OCSP Status
📊DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment.
DNS Health
DNS configuration and security assessment
DNSSEC Not Enabled
MEDIUMDNSSEC is not configured for this domain
CAA Records Not Configured
LOWCertificate Authority Authorization (CAA) records not found
DNS Records
DNSSEC Status
DNS Performance
SPF Analysis
⚡Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis.
Network Security
Port scanning and network exposure analysis
High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP
HIGHPort 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer
Service Exposed: SSH
MEDIUMPort 22 (SSH) is publicly accessible - SSH - Secure but can be brute-forced
🔧Technical Analysis
Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.
Technical Analysis
Comprehensive security assessment findings