Skip to main content

Is airbnb.at a Scam? Security Check Results - airbnb.at Reviews

A

Is airbnb.at Safe? Security Analysis for Access Denied

Check if airbnb.at is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherN/a
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:07:49 AM
57
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.airbnb.at is currently inaccessible due to an access denied error page served by the hosting server or a web application firewall (WAF). This prevents any meaningful extraction of business, technical, or security information from the site. The lack of WHOIS data further complicates trust and legitimacy assessments. Without access to the actual website content, metadata, or contact information, the analysis is severely limited. The domain appears to be protected or unregistered in the NIC.AT WHOIS database, which raises questions about registration transparency. Overall, the site cannot be evaluated for compliance, security posture, or business credibility at this time.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the absence of accessible content and WHOIS data, no business intelligence insights can be derived. The domain name suggests affiliation with Airbnb, a known global hospitality platform, but no confirmation or official data is available from the provided content. No partner or subsidiary domains were identified. The lack of contact or policy pages prevents assessment of customer engagement or regulatory compliance.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be assessed as the site is blocked by a WAF or server access control, and no security headers or HTTPS status could be verified. The absence of privacy, cookie, or incident response policies indicates potential compliance gaps. The domain's WHOIS data is unavailable, which may indicate privacy protection or registration issues. Overall, the security maturity appears low due to lack of accessible information and transparency.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the access denial issue to allow public access for proper analysis and user engagement.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Access Denied page detected with minimal HTML content and reference to an edge server error URL, indicating a WAF or security blocking mechanism.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is inaccessible due to access denial by server or WAF

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

80/100
Score

Weak Strict-Transport-Security configuration

LOW

Current value: "max-age=10886400; includeSubdomains"

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a4v1jq9a@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:a4v1jq9a@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Registration Details

DNS Records

A Records:166.117.189.176, 166.117.27.62
Name Servers:
dns1.p05.nsone.net
dns2.p05.nsone.net
dns3.p05.nsone.net
dns4.p05.nsone.net
ns-1087.awsdns-07.org
ns-1877.awsdns-42.co.uk
ns-394.awsdns-49.com
ns-949.awsdns-54.net
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:99ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

The technical infrastructure cannot be analyzed due to the access denied page and lack of HTML content beyond a minimal error message. No scripts, meta tags, or technology indicators are present. Hosting provider and CMS cannot be identified. Performance, mobile optimization, and SEO cannot be evaluated. The presence of a WAF or server-side blocking mechanism is inferred from the error message and reference URL.
Analyze Another Website