Skip to main content

Is airbnb.dk a Scam? Security Check Results - airbnb.dk Reviews

A

Is airbnb.dk Safe? Security Analysis for Access Denied

Check if airbnb.dk is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

OtherDenmark
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:07:48 AM
48
Security Score
HIGH RISK

AI Summary

The website www.airbnb.dk is currently inaccessible due to an access denied error page, which prevents any meaningful content or metadata extraction. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting the ability to verify domain registration details or ownership. Consequently, no business, technical, or security information can be reliably assessed from the website content. The lack of accessible content and WHOIS transparency significantly reduces the trust and credibility evaluation of this domain. Without access to the actual website or WHOIS data, it is impossible to provide a detailed analysis of the company's services, technical infrastructure, or security posture.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Due to the complete lack of accessible website content and WHOIS data, no business intelligence insights can be derived. The domain name suggests affiliation with Airbnb's Danish market presence, but this cannot be confirmed. No information about market positioning, business model, revenue streams, or partnerships is available. The absence of contact or policy information further limits any business-related analysis.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The security posture cannot be evaluated as the website content is blocked and no HTTP headers or SSL configuration details are available. The presence of an access denied page indicates some form of web application firewall or security control is active, but specifics are unknown. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosures are accessible. This lack of transparency and accessibility is a security concern as it prevents users and analysts from verifying the site's security maturity or compliance status.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Resolve the access denial issue to allow public access and enable comprehensive analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Access Denied page detected with minimal HTML content and no website data accessible.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is completely blocked by access denial.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a4v1jq9a@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:a4v1jq9a@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

75/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

Domain Transfer Lock Not Enabled

MEDIUM

Domain can be transferred without authorization

Domain Delete Lock Not Enabled

LOW

Domain can be deleted without additional verification

Domain Registration Details

Domain Age
15 years(mature)
Expiry Risk
medium(83 days)
Protection Level
noneDNSSEC OFF
Suspicious Indicators Detected
  • No domain protection locks enabled

DNS Records

A Records:166.117.27.62, 166.117.189.176
Name Servers:
airbnb.dkWHOIS only
ns-1087.awsdns-07.orgDNS only
ns-1877.awsdns-42.co.ukDNS only
ns-394.awsdns-49.comDNS only
ns-949.awsdns-54.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:102ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

No technical details about the website infrastructure, technology stack, or performance can be determined due to the access denied page. No scripts, meta tags, or CMS indicators are present. The lack of accessible content suggests either a restrictive firewall or misconfiguration preventing normal access. This represents a technical risk for user engagement and trust.
Analyze Another Website