Skip to main content

Is airbnb.pt a Scam? Security Check Results - Airbnb, Inc. Reviews

A

Is airbnb.pt Safe? Security Analysis for Airbnb, Inc.

Check if airbnb.pt is a scam or legitimate. Free security scan and reviews.

HospitalityPortugalenterprise
Analyzed 9/6/2025Completed 3:08:09 AM
50
Security Score
MEDIUM RISK

AI Summary

The website www.airbnb.pt is currently inaccessible due to a Web Application Firewall (WAF) or security mechanism blocking access, as evidenced by the 'Access Denied' page and minimal HTML content. This prevents a full analysis of the website's content, metadata, and technical implementation. The domain is registered legitimately to Airbnb, Inc., a well-known enterprise in the hospitality sector, with domain registration details consistent with the company's business history and location. Due to the blocked content, no privacy, cookie, or security policies are accessible, and no contact information or business details can be extracted from the site itself. The security posture cannot be fully assessed, but the presence of a WAF indicates some level of security enforcement. Overall, the site is rated low in accessibility and content quality due to the block, but the domain legitimacy remains high.

🧠AI Business Intelligence

Technology stack, business insights, and market analysis powered by AI.

Business Intelligence

Market & Strategic Analysis

Airbnb, Inc. operates in the hospitality industry, providing an online marketplace for lodging and tourism experiences. The Portuguese domain www.airbnb.pt likely serves the Portugal market segment. The company is a large enterprise with a strong global market position. Due to the blocked content, no direct insights into local business operations, partnerships, or specific services offered on this domain can be obtained. The domain registration aligns with the parent company, indicating consistent branding and market presence.

Security Posture Analysis

Comprehensive Security Assessment

The website is protected by a WAF or similar security mechanism, which blocks unauthorized access and potential threats. However, the inability to access the site content limits the evaluation of security headers, SSL configuration, and vulnerability disclosures. No security policies or incident response contacts are visible. The domain registration is consistent and legitimate, reducing suspicion of malicious activity. Overall, the security posture appears cautious but cannot be fully verified.

Strategic Recommendations

Priority Actions for Security Improvement

1

Provide controlled access or allow security scanning to enable comprehensive security and compliance analysis.

Observations

AI-powered comprehensive website and business analysis.

AI-Enhanced Website Analysis

Generic Detected

Access Denied page detected with minimal HTML content and reference to errors.edgesuite.net, indicating a WAF or security mechanism blocking access.

Analysis results may be incomplete. For accurate analysis, please contact guard@offseq.com

Business Insights

Company:

Airbnb, Inc.

Content Quality:

poor

Technical Stack

Security Assessment

0

Analytics & Tracking

Advertising & Marketing

Website Quality Assessment

Design Quality:poor
User Experience:poor
Content Relevance:poor
Navigation Clarity:poor
Professionalism:poor
Trustworthiness:low

Key Observations

1

Website content is blocked by a WAF or security mechanism, preventing access to actual content.

🛡️Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis and recommendations.

Security Headers

HTTP security headers analysis

15/100
Score

Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

HIGH

Forces HTTPS connections

Missing X-Frame-Options header

HIGH

Prevents clickjacking attacks

Missing X-Content-Type-Options header

MEDIUM

Prevents MIME type sniffing

Missing Content-Security-Policy header

HIGH

Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

Missing X-XSS-Protection header

MEDIUM

Legacy XSS protection (deprecated but still recommended)

Missing Referrer-Policy header

LOW

Controls referrer information sent with requests

Missing Permissions-Policy header

MEDIUM

Controls browser features and APIs

Sensitive data may be cached

LOW

Cache-Control header should include "no-store" for sensitive pages

👤GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment under GDPR regulations.

GDPR Compliance

Privacy and data protection assessment

25/100
Score

No Privacy Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

No Cookie Policy found

HIGH

GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

No Cookie Consent Banner found

HIGH

GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

EU business without adequate privacy measures

CRITICAL

EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

GDPR Compliance Analysis

Privacy Policy0% confidence
Cookie Policy0% confidence
Contact Information Found90% confidence
phone

🛡️NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive compliance assessment.

NIS2 Compliance

Network & Information Security Directive

17/100
Score

No information security framework found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity and information security measures

No vulnerability disclosure policy

MEDIUM

NIS2 encourages coordinated vulnerability disclosure

No security policy documentation found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented cybersecurity governance and risk management

No incident response procedures found

HIGH

NIS2 requires documented incident response and business continuity plans

No business continuity planning found

MEDIUM

NIS2 emphasizes operational resilience and business continuity

No security contact information

HIGH

NIS2 requires clear incident reporting channels

No vulnerability reporting mechanism

MEDIUM

Clear vulnerability reporting supports coordinated disclosure

No NIS2 reference found

LOW

Consider explicitly mentioning NIS2 compliance efforts

📧Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation and email security assessment.

Email Security

SPF, DKIM, and DMARC validation

70/100
Score

No DKIM record found

MEDIUM

DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

No BIMI Record

LOW

BIMI displays brand logos in email clients

No MTA-STS Policy

MEDIUM

MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

No TLS-RPT Record

LOW

TLS-RPT provides reporting for email TLS issues

SPF
Sender Policy Framework
DKIM
DomainKeys Identified Mail
DMARC
Domain-based Message Authentication
MX Records
Mail Exchange Records
BIMI
Brand Indicators
MTA-STS
Mail Transfer Agent Security
TLS-RPT
TLS Reporting
DNSSEC
DNS Security
SPF Details
Record:
v=spf1 -all
DNS Lookups:0/10
Policy:-all
DMARC Details
Policy:reject
Subdomain Policy:reject
Aggregate Reports:a4v1jq9a@ag.dmarcian.com
Forensic Reports:a4v1jq9a@fr.dmarcian.com

🏆SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis.

SSL/TLS Security

Certificate validity and encryption analysis

62/100
Score

Weak Protocols Supported

HIGH

Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

Certificate Transparency Not Implemented

LOW

Certificate is not logged in Certificate Transparency logs

Weak SSL Key Length

HIGH

SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

Partial SSL/TLS Assessment

LOW

Completed 3 of 4 security checks due to time constraints

Protocol Support

TLSv1.3TLSv1.2TLSv1.1

OCSP Status

OCSP Stapling Enabled

📊DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment.

DNS Health

DNS configuration and security assessment

90/100
Score

DNSSEC Not Enabled

MEDIUM

DNSSEC is not configured for this domain

DNS Records

A Records:166.117.189.176, 166.117.27.62
Name Servers:
dns1.p02.nsone.netDNS only
dns2.p02.nsone.netDNS only
dns3.p02.nsone.netDNS only
dns4.p02.nsone.netDNS only
ns-1087.awsdns-07.orgDNS only
ns-1877.awsdns-42.co.ukDNS only
ns-394.awsdns-49.comDNS only
ns-949.awsdns-54.netDNS only
SOA:Serial: 1, TTL: 86400s

DNSSEC Status

DNSSEC Not Enabled

DNS Performance

Resolution Time:85ms

SPF Analysis

SPF Record:
v=spf1 -all

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis.

Network Security

Port scanning and network exposure analysis

100/100
Score

Good Network Security Posture

LOW

No unnecessary services detected on common risky ports

🔧Technical Analysis

Detailed technical findings and analysis from AI assessment.

Technical Analysis

Comprehensive security assessment findings

Additional Findings

Due to the access denial, no technical details such as technology stack, frameworks, CMS, or hosting provider could be identified. The presence of a WAF indicates a security-focused hosting environment. No performance or mobile optimization data is available. The domain is served over HTTPS as expected for a major enterprise, but this cannot be confirmed from the provided content. The lack of metadata and scripts prevents further technical assessment.
Analyze Another Website